ReviewJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2021
Conservative Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Indian Contribution.
Review in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sexual Function in Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Pilot Study on the Feasibility of Routine Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Uterine procidentia in a virgin woman: A rare case.Urology case reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Exploring nulliparous women's perceptions of pelvic organ prolapse treatments: A qualitative study for enhancing nursing care in Romania.Belitung nursing journal · 2024Article
- Imaging of pelvic floor disorders involving the posterior compartment on dynamic MR defaecography.SA journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Mostafa Maged sling technique to treat prolapsed uterus in an easy way (New Technique).Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2023Article
- Extremely Elongated Cervix in an Adolescent Girl: Literature Review and Report of a Rare Case.Cureus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a very common condition which can greatly impact a woman's quality of life. Treatment options are individualized and typically involve a combination of physiotherapy, pessary insertion and surgical treatments. It is well known that nulliparous prolapse in India constitutes 1.5-2% of genital prolapse, while the incidence is even higher (5-8%) for young women who have delivered one or two children, thus making it one of the highest rates in the world. This has necessitated the development of numerous conservative surgical treatment options for POP, which allows women to retain their sexual and reproductive function and therefore allows for subsequent pregnancies. With the controversy surrounding the use of mesh, a variety of surgical treatment options should be considered. Such alternative treatments include the use of surgical sling procedures, which have been used widely in Indian practice for the treatment of POP for over 60 years. This review outlines some of the well-established conservative treatment options for POP. It also highlights the unique contribution of Indian Obstetricians in the development of these conservative surgical treatment options, from prominent Indian Gynecologists including Dr VN Shirodkar, Dr BN Purandare, VN Purandare, RP Soonawala, Brigadier SD Khanna and Dr RM Nadkarni.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.