Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33814793›Full record

ReviewJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2021

Conservative Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Indian Contribution.

Gillian A Ryan, Nikhil C Purandare, Simran A Ganeriwal, Chittaranjan N Purandare

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gillian A RyanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The National Maternity Hospital, Holles St, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0478-1900
Nikhil C PurandareDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
Simran A GaneriwalSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Chittaranjan N PurandareIndian College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mumbai, India.
National Maternity Hospital · IEOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a very common condition which can greatly impact a woman's quality of life. Treatment options are individualized and typically involve a combination of physiotherapy, pessary insertion and surgical treatments. It is well known that nulliparous prolapse in India constitutes 1.5-2% of genital prolapse, while the incidence is even higher (5-8%) for young women who have delivered one or two children, thus making it one of the highest rates in the world. This has necessitated the development of numerous conservative surgical treatment options for POP, which allows women to retain their sexual and reproductive function and therefore allows for subsequent pregnancies. With the controversy surrounding the use of mesh, a variety of surgical treatment options should be considered. Such alternative treatments include the use of surgical sling procedures, which have been used widely in Indian practice for the treatment of POP for over 60 years. This review outlines some of the well-established conservative treatment options for POP. It also highlights the unique contribution of Indian Obstetricians in the development of these conservative surgical treatment options, from prominent Indian Gynecologists including Dr VN Shirodkar, Dr BN Purandare, VN Purandare, RP Soonawala, Brigadier SD Khanna and Dr RM Nadkarni.

Indexed as

Conservative management of pelvic organ prolapseConservative surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapsePelvic organ prolapse

Identifiers

PMID33814793
PMCPMC7960828
OpenAlexW3118708791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.