ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2021
Machine-assisted foot stretching in the elderly: a comparison with self-stretching.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Self-stretching is the traditional at-home stretching method of choice. We developed an automatic foot-stretching machine to perform effective dorsiflexion stretching safely and easily at home. The effects of automatic stretching using our machine and self-stretching were investigated and compared. [Participants and Methods] Twelve healthy elderly people participated in the study. Automatic dorsiflexion static stretching was performed with the right foot, and self-stretching using a towel was performed with the left foot. Before and after each stretching, passive range of motion in dorsiflexion, maximal voluntary contraction strength in plantarflexion, passive resistive torque during passive dorsiflexion, and displacement of the muscle-tendon junction of the medial gastrocnemius muscle were measured. [Results] The range of motion in dorsiflexion had a significantly greater increase after automatic stretching than after self-stretching. The maximum strength in plantarflexion tended to decrease after automatic stretching but did not decrease after self-stretching. The passive resistive torque in both types of stretches decreased in some of the participants but increased in others. The displacement of the muscle-tendon junction of the medial gastrocnemius tended to shorten during automatic stretching as compared with self-stretching. [Conclusion] Foot stretching using a machine is as effective as self-stretching and tends to affect the tendon rather than the muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.