Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33814674›Full record

ArticleJournal of manufacturing systems2021

Case study into the successful emergency production and certification of a filtering facepiece respirator for Belgian hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Andres Vanhooydonck, Sander Van Goethem, Joren Van Loon, Robin Vandormael, Jochen Vleugels, Thomas Peeters, Sam Smedts, Drim Stokhuijzen, Marieke Van Camp, Lore Veelaert and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of manufacturing systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andres VanhooydonckDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sander Van GoethemDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Joren Van LoonDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Robin VandormaelDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jochen VleugelsDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Thomas PeetersDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sam SmedtsDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Drim StokhuijzenDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Marieke Van CampDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Lore VeelaertDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jouke VerlindenDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Stijn VerwulgenDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Regan WattsDepartment of Product Development, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic presented European hospitals with chronic shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as surgical masks and respirator masks. Demand outstripped the production capacity of certified European manufacturers of these devices. Hospitals perceived emergency local manufacturing of PPE as an approach to reduce dependence on foreign supply. The fact of a pandemic does not circumvent the hospital's responsibility to provide appropriate protective equipment to their staff, so the emergency production needed to result in devices that were certified by testing agencies. This paper is a case study of the emergency manufacturing of respirator masks during the first month of the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and is separated into two distinct phases. Phase A describes the three-panel folding facepiece respirator design, material sourcing, performance testing, and an analysis of the folding facepiece respirator assembly process. Phase B describes the redevelopment of individual steps in the assembly process.

Indexed as

Agile developmentCOVID-19Nimble manufacturingProduct developmentRapid prototypingRespirator

Identifiers

PMID33814674
PMCPMC7997305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.