Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33814668›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychophysiology2020

Social Feedback Valence Differentially Modulates the Reward Positivity, P300, and Late Positive Potential.

Carter J Funkhouser, Randy P Auerbach, Autumn Kujawa, Sylvia A Morelli, K Luan Phan, Stewart A Shankman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carter J FunkhouserDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Randy P AuerbachDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University.
Autumn KujawaDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University.
Sylvia A MorelliDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago.
K Luan PhanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Stewart A ShankmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago.
University of Illinois Chicago · USArthur M. Sackler Gallery · USNorthwestern University · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Identifying Social Processes Implicated in Remitted Recurrent DepressionR21MH112330 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI AUERBACH, RANDY PATRICK, SHANKMAN, STEWART AARON · 2017 to 2018
$458k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH112330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal social or reward processing is associated with several mental disorders. Although most studies examining reward processing have focused on monetary rewards, recent research also has tested neural reactivity to social rewards (e.g., positive social feedback). However, the majority of these studies only include two feedback valences (e.g., acceptance, rejection). Yet, social evaluation is rarely binary (positive vs. negative) and people often give 'on the fence' or neutral evaluations of others. Processing of this type of social feedback may be ambiguous and impacted by factors such as psychopathology, self-esteem, and prior experiences of rejection. Thus, the present study probed the reward positivity (RewP), P300, and late positive potential (LPP) following acceptance, rejection, and "one the fence" [between acceptance and rejection] feedback in undergraduate students (

Identifiers

PMID33814668
PMCPMC8011565
OpenAlexW2981738553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.