Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33814552›Full record

ArticleRevista clinica espanola

[Telemedicine, ethics, and law in times of COVID-19. A look towards the future].

C Gil Membrado, V Barrios, J Cosín-Sales, J M Gámez

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista clinica espanola. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C Gil MembradoFacultad de Derecho, Universidad de las Islas Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, España.
V BarriosServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España.
J Cosín-SalesServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, España.
J M GámezServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health emergency in Spain caused by COVID-19 was of such a magnitude that on March 14, 2020, a state of alarm was declared that lasted for more than three months. This ongoing pandemic has affected a vast number of people. Among the measures taken to reduce the risk of contagion, visits to health centers have been reduced and virtual consultations have increased. Once the pandemic ends, it will be necessary to consider whether telemedicine should be limited to periods of health crises or whether it could become a new way of practicing medicine. Telemedicine lacks specific regulations and has loopholes that leave physicians with a considerable degree of insecurity. This article analyzes the limits, precautions, and legal standards of the use of telemedicine.

Indexed as

COVID-19EthicsLegislationSpainTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33814552
PMCPMC7998043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.