Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33814548›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2021

Effects of Different Exposure Days to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) on Live Birth Rates in the Depot GnRH-a Protocol: A Retrospective Analysis of 7007 Cycles.

Jianyuan Song, Wei Wu, Liu Jiang, Cuicui Duan, Jian Xu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jianyuan SongReproductive Medicine Center, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Wei WuReproductive Medicine Center, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Liu JiangReproductive Medicine Center, First Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Cuicui DuanReproductive Medicine Center, Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Jian XuReproductive Medicine Center, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Zhejiang University · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND In controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols worldwide, depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) pretreatment is generally used for pituitary desensitization. The delay between the GnRH-a administration and starting gonadotropin treatment varies greatly, from 25 to 60 days. However, the association between exposure days to GnRH-a before the onset of gonadotropin administration and the clinical outcomes remains unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study included 7007 patients who underwent fresh embryo transfers between February 2016 and July 2019. The duration of pituitary downregulation was categorized into 3 groups: group 1, ≤30 days; group 2, 31-35 days; and group 3, ≥36 days. The rates of live birth were compared as the main outcome measure. Logistic regression analysis was also performed after controlling for a range of confounders. RESULTS The number of patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 2001, 2824, and 2182, respectively. Group 3 (≥36 days) had a noticeably higher live birth rate (48.1%) than the other 2 groups (42.6% and 43.9%, P=0.001). The rate of live birth was remarkably enhanced in group 3 (adjusted odds ratio: 1.264, 95% confidence interval: 1.098, 1.455, P=0.001) after controlling for confounders, while the difference was not found in group 2 (P=0.512) compared with group 1. CONCLUSIONS In the depot GnRH-a protocol, live birth rates are higher among patients needing a longer time to achieve the goal of pituitary downregulation.

Indexed as

PregnancyAdultBirth RateChorionic GonadotropinEmbryo TransferFemaleGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansLive BirthOvulation InductionPituitary GlandPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesChorionic GonadotropinGonadotropin-Releasing Hormone

Identifiers

PMID33814548
PMCPMC8034236
OpenAlexW3132008760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.