ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Rapid and sensitive detection of Karlodinium veneficum by a novel double-nick rolling circle amplification.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Harmful algal blooms caused by Karlodinium veneficum recently occurred with high incidence, posing a serious threat to the marine ecological environment, public health, and mariculture. It is therefore rather vital to establish a method for rapid detection of K. veneficum. In this study, the D1-D2 region of the large subunit rDNA (LSU rDNA D1-D2) of K. veneficum was cloned and sequenced to design the specific probes and primers. A novel method referred to as double-nick rolling circle amplification (dn-RCA) based on the designed probes and primers was initially established. The optimal reaction conditions for dn-RCA were as follows: probe concentration, 200 pM; ligation temperature, 57 °C; ligation time, 50 min; amplification temperature, 60 °C; and amplification time, 60 min. Furthermore, lateral flow dipstick (LFD) was employed instead of agarose gel electrophoresis to analyze dn-RCA products, which can simplify the detection procedure and reduce the operation time. The sensitivity of dn-RCA-LFD was tested with the genomic DNA, the recombinant plasmid containing the inserted LSU rDNA D1-D2, and the DNA crude extract of K. veneficum. The results showed that the sensitivity of dn-RCA-LFD was 10 times higher than that of conventional PCR; the detection limit of dn-RCA-LFD was 1.1 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.