Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33813627›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Development of a diagnostic model to identify patients at high risk for cerebellopontine angle lesions.

Mayke Hentschel, Maroeska Rovers, Stefan Steens, Gerjon Hannink, Henricus Kunst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mayke HentschelDepartment of Otolaryngology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Philips van Leydenlaan 15, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. mayke.hentschel@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6106-089X
Maroeska RoversDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Stefan SteensDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gerjon HanninkDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Henricus KunstDepartment of Otolaryngology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Philips van Leydenlaan 15, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 837002523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a diagnostic model to identify patients at high risk of a CPA lesion.

methodsA consecutive cohort of patients with AAD referred by a general practitioner, who underwent their first MRI examination of the CPA between 2005 and 2015 was included. Demographics, symptoms, findings during physical examination, and pure-tone audiometry were used as potential predictors. The presence of a CPA lesion was used as outcome.

resultsWe analyzed data of 2,214 patients, detecting 73 CPA lesions in 69 (3.1%) patients. The final model contained eleven variables, namely gender [male] [OR 1.055 (95% CI 0.885-1.905)], sudden onset of hearing loss [OR 0.768 (95% CI 0.318-0.992)], gradual onset of hearing loss [OR 1.069 (95% CI 0.500-1.450)], unilateral tinnitus [OR 0.682 (95% CI 0.374-0.999)], complaints of unilateral aural fullness [OR 1.006 (95% CI 0.783-2.155)], instability [OR 1.006 (95% CI 0.580-2.121)], headache [OR 0.959 (95% CI 0.059-1.090)], facial numbness [OR 2.746 (95% CI 0.548-11.085)], facial nerve dysfunction during physical examination [OR 1.024 (95% CI 0.280-3.702)], and asymmetry in BC at 1 kHz [OR 1.013 (95% CI 1.000-1.027)] and 4 kHz [OR 1.008 (95% CI 1.000-1.026)].

conclusionThe proposed diagnostic model is a first step in selecting patients with a high risk of a CPA lesion among those with AAD. It needs to be externally validated prior to its implementation in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Hearing LossTinnitusAudiometry, Pure-ToneCerebellopontine AngleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleCerebellopontine angleDiagnosisMRIPrediction modelVestibular schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID33813627
PMCPMC8897319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.