Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33813122›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2021

SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell immunity in COVID-19 convalescent patients and unexposed controls measured by ex vivo ELISpot assay.

Irene Cassaniti, Elena Percivalle, Federica Bergami, Antonio Piralla, Giuditta Comolli, Raffaele Bruno, Marco Vecchia, Margherita Sambo, Marta Colaneri, Valentina Zuccaro and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. T-cell proliferation assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cells.Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irene CassanitiMolecular Virology Unit, Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. Electronic address: i.cassaniti@smatteo.pv.it.
Elena PercivalleMolecular Virology Unit, Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Federica BergamiMolecular Virology Unit, Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Antonio PirallaMolecular Virology Unit, Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Giuditta ComolliMolecular Virology Unit, Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Experimental Research Laboratories, Biotechnology Area, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Raffaele BrunoDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Division of Infectious Diseases I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Marco VecchiaDivision of Infectious Diseases I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Margherita SamboDivision of Infectious Diseases I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Marta ColaneriDivision of Infectious Diseases I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Valentina ZuccaroDivision of Infectious Diseases I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Marco BenazzoDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Department of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, University of Pavia and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Carlo RobottiDepartment of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, University of Pavia and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Anna CalastriDepartment of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, University of Pavia and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Eugenia MaioranoDepartment of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, University of Pavia and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Alessandro FerrariMolecular Virology Unit, Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Giuseppe CambièImmunohematology and Transfusion Medicine Unit, Ospedale Maggiore di Lodi, Lodi, Italy.
Fausto BaldantiMolecular Virology Unit, Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSARS-CoV-2 T-cell response characterization represents a crucial issue for defining the role of immune protection against COVID-19. The aim of the study was to assess the SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response in a cohort of COVID-19 convalescent patients and in a group of unexposed subjects.

methodsSARS-CoV-2 T-cell response was quantified from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of 87 COVID-19 convalescent subjects (range 7-239 days after symptom onset) and 33 unexposed donors by ex vivo ELISpot assay. Follow-up of SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response was performed in ten subjects up to 12 months after symptom onset. The role of SARS-CoV-2 specific CD4 and CD8 T cells was characterized in a group of COVID-19 convalescent subjects. Moreover, neutralizing antibodies were determined in serum samples.

resultsIn 14/33 (42.4%) unexposed donors and 85/87 (97.7%) COVID-19 convalescent subjects a positive result for at least one SARS-CoV-2 antigen was observed. A positive response was observed up to 12 months after COVID-19 infection (median 246 days after symptom onset; range 118-362 days). Of note, SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response seems to be mainly mediated by CD4 T cells. A weak positive correlation was observed between Spike-specific T-cell response and neutralizing antibody titre (p 0.0028; r DISCUSSION: Cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response in uninfected patients may be due to previous infections with other common coronaviruses. Our data suggest that long-term SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response might accompany a waning humoral response.

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCohort StudiesConvalescenceCOVID-19Cross ReactionsEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayFemaleFollow-Up StudiesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralELISpotHumoral responseNeutralizing antibodiesSARS-CoV-2T-cell response

Identifiers

PMID33813122
PMCPMC8016542
OpenAlexW3151598068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.