Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33812991›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2021

Retaining diverse adults with diabetes in a long-term trial: Strategies, successes, and lessons learned.

Lyndsay A Nelson, Sarah E Williamson, Lauren M LeStourgeon, Lindsay S Mayberry

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lyndsay A NelsonDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Diabetes Translation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sarah E WilliamsonDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; DeBusk College of Osteopathic Medicine, Lincoln Memorial University, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Lauren M LeStourgeonDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Lindsay S MayberryDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Center for Diabetes Translation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: lindsay.mayberry@vumc.org.
Lincoln Memorial University · US

Funding

Improving Medication Adherence among Underserved Patients with Type 2 DiabetesR01DK100694 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAYBERRY, LINDSAY S. · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
Vanderbilt Scholars in T4 Translational Research (V-STTaR) ProgramK12HL137943 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KRIPALANI, SUNIL, ROUMIE, CHRISTIANNE L. · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Targeting Family Behaviors to Improve Diabetes Management among Adults with Type 2 DiabetesK01DK106306 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAYBERRY, LINDSAY S. · 2015 to 2018
$568k
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL137943NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK106306NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Retention can be difficult in longitudinal trials, especially among minoritized groups and individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) who may experience more barriers to research participation. Organized retention strategies may help; however, limited research has reported on this in detail. Methods We employed several strategies throughout a 15-month randomized controlled trial to encourage retention among a diverse sample of adults with type 2 diabetes. Participants were randomized to receive mobile health support for diabetes self-care for 12 months or an attention control. Participants completed assessments at 3, 6, 12, and 15 months post-baseline. We used three main categories of retention strategies: flexibility in participation (e.g., multiple methods for data collection), communication (e.g., tracking contacts), and community building (e.g., study branding, newsletters). We monitored participants' use of strategies and examined associations between participant characteristics and retention. Results Retention remained high (≥90%) at each follow-up assessment. Participants used various methods for survey completion: online (34%), in-person (31%), and mail (30%). Most (73%) used a mail-in A1c kit at least once. Multiple completion methods were important for retaining minoritized and lower SES participants who completed assessments in-person more frequently. Communication also facilitated retention; 39% of participants used a study Helpline and tracking systems helped maintain contact. Conclusions Retaining disadvantaged patients in clinical trials is necessary so findings generalize to and can benefit these populations. Retention strategies that reduce barriers to participation and engage participants and community partners can be successful. Future studies should assess the impact of retention strategies.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2TelemedicineAdultHumansSelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesVulnerable PopulationsBarriers to participationLongitudinal trialRacial disparitiesRetentionRetention strategiesType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33812991
PMCPMC8172486
OpenAlexW3140683971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.