ArticleBiophysical journal2021
Empirical Bayes method using surrounding pixel information for number and brightness analysis.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determining the Functional Oligomeric State of Membrane-Associated Protein Oligomers Forming Membrane Pores on Giant Lipid Vesicles.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Number and brightness (N&B) analysis is useful for monitoring the spatial distribution of the concentration and oligomeric state of fluorescently labeled proteins in cells. N&B analysis is based on the statistical analysis of fluorescence images by using the method of moments (MoM). Furthermore, N&B analysis can determine the particle number and particle brightness, which indicate the concentration and oligomeric state, respectively. However, the statistical accuracy and precision are limited in actual experiments with fluorescent proteins, owing to low excitation and the limited number of images. In this study, we applied maximum likelihood (ML) estimation and maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation coupled with the empirical Bayes (EB) method (referred to as EB-MAP). In EB-MAP, we constructed a simple prior distribution for a pixel to utilize the information of the surrounding pixels. To evaluate the accuracy and precision of our method, we conducted simulations and experiments and compared the results of MoM, ML, and EB-MAP. The results showed that MoM estimated the particle number with many outliers. The outliers hampered the visibility of the spatial distribution and cellular structure. In contrast, EB-MAP suppressed the number of outliers and improved the visibility notably. The precision of EB-MAP was better by an order of magnitude in terms of particle number and 1.5 times better in terms of particle brightness compared with those of MoM. The proposed method (EB-MAP-N&B) is applicable to studies on fluorescence imaging and would aid in accurately recognizing changes in the concentration and oligomeric state in cells. Our results hold significant importance because quantifying the concentration and oligomeric state would contribute to the understanding of dynamic processes in molecular mechanism in cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.