Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33812369›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Development, validation, and proof-of-concept implementation of a two-year risk prediction model for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using common electronic health data (UNAFIED).

Randall W Grout, Siu L Hui, Timothy D Imler, Sarah El-Azab, Jarod Baker, George H Sands, Mohammad Ateya, Francis Pike

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is machine learning the future for atrial fibrillation screening?Cardiovascular digital health journal · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Randall W GroutCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, 1101 W Tenth St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. rgrout@iu.edu.
Siu L HuiCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, 1101 W Tenth St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Timothy D ImlerCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, 1101 W Tenth St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Sarah El-AzabResearch Services, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jarod BakerCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, 1101 W Tenth St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
George H SandsPfizer Inc, US Medical Affairs, New York, NY, USA.
Mohammad AteyaPfizer Inc, US Medical Affairs, New York, NY, USA.
Francis PikeDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

Leveraging Infrastructure to train investigators in patient centered outcomes research in the learning health system (LITI-PCORLHS)K12HS026390 · AHRQ · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CARROLL, AARON E., EMBI, PETER J. · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remain undiagnosed despite availability of interventions to reduce stroke risk. Predictive models to date are limited by data requirements and theoretical usage. We aimed to develop a model for predicting the 2-year probability of AF diagnosis and implement it as proof-of-concept (POC) in a production electronic health record (EHR).

methodsWe used a nested case-control design using data from the Indiana Network for Patient Care. The development cohort came from 2016 to 2017 (outcome period) and 2014 to 2015 (baseline). A separate validation cohort used outcome and baseline periods shifted 2 years before respective development cohort times. Machine learning approaches were used to build predictive model. Patients ≥ 18 years, later restricted to age ≥ 40 years, with at least two encounters and no AF during baseline, were included. In the 6-week EHR prospective pilot, the model was silently implemented in the production system at a large safety-net urban hospital. Three new and two previous logistic regression models were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristics. Number, characteristics, and CHA

resultsAfter restricting age to ≥ 40 years, 31,474 AF cases (mean age, 71.5 years; female 49%) and 22,078 controls (mean age, 59.5 years; female 61%) comprised the development cohort. A 10-variable model using age, acute heart disease, albumin, body mass index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gender, heart failure, insurance, kidney disease, and shock yielded the best performance (C-statistic, 0.80 [95% CI 0.79-0.80]). The model performed well in the validation cohort (C-statistic, 0.81 [95% CI 0.8-0.81]). In the EHR pilot, 7916/22,272 (35.5%; mean age, 66 years; female 50%) were identified as higher risk for AF; 5582 (70%) had CHA

conclusionsUsing variables commonly available in the EHR, we created a predictive model to identify 2-year risk of developing AF in those previously without diagnosed AF. Successful POC implementation of the model in an EHR provided a practical strategy to identify patients who may benefit from interventions to reduce their stroke risk.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationStrokeAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansIndianaMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAtrial fibrillationDecision supportElectronic health recordMachine learningPredictive modelScreening

Identifiers

PMID33812369
PMCPMC8019173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.