ArticleGait & posture2021
User-driven treadmill walking promotes healthy step width after stroke.
Article in Gait & posture, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive treadmill control can be manipulated to increase propulsive impulse while maintaining walking speed.Journal of biomechanics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWalking with user-driven treadmill control is believed to be more like overground walking than fixed-speed treadmill walking. Walking speed and ground reaction forces differ between overground and fixed-speed treadmill walking, but not between overground and user-driven treadmill walking in healthy and post-stroke subjects. However, studies assessing spatiotemporal gait parameters during user-driven treadmill walking are limited. This information may help confirm that user-driven treadmill walking is more like overground walking than fixed-speed treadmill walking, as well as inform the development of post-stroke gait rehabilitation programs. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do spatiotemporal gait parameters for individuals post-stroke differ between fixed-speed and user-driven treadmill walking?
methodsEighteen subjects (10 M, 8 F; 62 ± 12 years; 1.73 ± 0.12 m; 84.9 ± 12.9 kg; 40 ± 30 months post-stroke) with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis participated in this study. Participants walked on an instrumented treadmill in its fixed-speed and user-driven modes at their self-selected and fastest comfortable walking speeds. Subjects wore retroreflective markers for motion capture. Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to assess for normality and one-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare between conditions with α = 0.05. Bonferroni corrections were used for multiple comparisons.
resultsStep width was significantly smaller with user-driven control (13.7 cm, 95 % CI: [0.131, 0.145]) than fixed-speed control (16.8 cm, 95 % CI:[0.160, 0.174]), while step length and step time did not differ across treadmill conditions. Step length and step time differed between self-selected and fast walking speeds, but not treadmill control conditions. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study show that user-driven treadmill control encourages healthy gait biomechanics and a greater sense of stability in post-stroke subjects. Individuals post-stroke walked with smaller step width with user-driven treadmill control, which has been associated with increased balance. Post-stroke gait rehabilitation may benefit from programs with user-driven treadmill training paradigms to improve mobility following stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.