Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811818›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Planetary health2021

Effect of nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions with participatory videos and women's group meetings on maternal and child nutritional outcomes in rural Odisha, India (UPAVAN trial): a four-arm, observer-blind, cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Suneetha Kadiyala, Helen Harris-Fry, Ronali Pradhan, Satyanarayan Mohanty, Shibanath Padhan, Suchitra Rath, Philip James, Emily Fivian, Peggy Koniz-Booher, Nirmala Nair and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Suneetha KadiyalaDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: suneetha.kadiyala@lshtm.ac.uk.
Helen Harris-FryDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ronali PradhanDigital Green, New Delhi, India.
Satyanarayan MohantyDCOR Consulting, Bhubaneshwar, India.
Shibanath PadhanVoluntary Association for Rural Reconstruction and Appropriate Technology, Kendrapara, India.
Suchitra RathEkjut, Chakradharpur, India.
Philip JamesDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Emily FivianDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Peggy Koniz-BooherJSI Research & Training Institute, Arlington, VA, USA.
Nirmala NairEkjut, Chakradharpur, India.
Hassan Haghparast-BidgoliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Naba Kishor MishraVoluntary Association for Rural Reconstruction and Appropriate Technology, Kendrapara, India.
Shibanand RathEkjut, Chakradharpur, India.
Emma BeaumontDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Heather DantonJSI Research & Training Institute, Arlington, VA, USA.
Sneha KrishnanEnvironment, Technology and Community Health Consultancy Service, Mumbai, India; Jindal School of Environment and Sustainability, Jindal Global University, Haryana, India.
Manoj ParidaDCOR Consulting, Bhubaneshwar, India.
Meghan O'HearnFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Abhinav KumarDigital Green, New Delhi, India.
Avinash UpadhyayDigital Green, New Delhi, India.
Prasanta TripathyEkjut, Chakradharpur, India.
Jolene SkordisInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Joanna SturgessDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Diana ElbourneDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Audrey ProstInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Elizabeth AllenDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBEkjut · INUniversity College London · GBProfessional Education and Research Institute · USProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · INO. P. Jindal Global University · INTufts University · US

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 210894/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlmost a quarter of the world's undernourished people live in India. We tested the effects of three nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA) interventions on maternal and child nutrition in India.

methodsWe did a parallel, four-arm, observer-blind, cluster-randomised trial in Keonjhar district, Odisha, India. A cluster was one or more villages with a combined minimum population of 800 residents. The clusters were allocated 1:1:1:1 to a control group or an intervention group of fortnightly women's groups meetings and household visits over 32 months using: NSA videos (AGRI group); NSA and nutrition-specific videos (AGRI-NUT group); or NSA videos and a nutrition-specific participatory learning and action (PLA) cycle meetings and videos (AGRI-NUT+PLA group). Primary outcomes were the proportion of children aged 6-23 months consuming at least four of seven food groups the previous day and mean maternal body-mass index (BMI). Secondary outcomes were proportion of mothers consuming at least five of ten food groups and child wasting (proportion of children with weight-for-height Z score SD <-2). Outcomes were assessed in children and mothers through cross-sectional surveys at baseline and at endline, 36 months later. Analyses were by intention to treat. Participants and intervention facilitators were not blinded to allocation; the research team were. This trial is registered at ISRCTN, ISRCTN65922679.

findings148 of 162 clusters assessed for eligibility were enrolled and randomly allocated to trial groups (37 clusters per group). Baseline surveys took place from Nov 24, 2016, to Jan 24, 2017; clusters were randomised from December, 2016, to January, 2017; and interventions were implemented from March 20, 2017, to Oct 31, 2019, and endline surveys done from Nov 19, 2019, to Jan 12, 2020, in an average of 32 households per cluster. All clusters were included in the analyses. There was an increase in the proportion of children consuming at least four of seven food groups in the AGRI-NUT (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1·19, 95% CI 1·03 to 1·37, p=0·02) and AGRI-NUT+PLA (1·27, 1·11 to 1·46, p=0·001) groups, but not AGRI (1·06, 0·91 to 1·23, p=0·44), compared with the control group. We found no effects on mean maternal BMI (adjusted mean differences vs control, AGRI -0·05, -0·34 to 0·24; AGRI-NUT 0·04, -0·26 to 0·33; AGRI-NUT+PLA -0·03, -0·3 to 0·23). An increase in the proportion of mothers consuming at least five of ten food groups was seen in the AGRI (adjusted RR 1·21, 1·01 to 1·45) and AGRI-NUT+PLA (1·30, 1·10 to 1·53) groups compared with the control group, but not in AGRI-NUT (1·16, 0·98 to 1·38). We found no effects on child wasting (adjusted RR vs control, AGRI 0·95, 0·73 to 1·24; AGRI-NUT 0·96, 0·72 to 1·29; AGRI-NUT+PLA 0·96, 0·73 to 1·26).

interpretationWomen's groups using combinations of NSA videos, nutrition-specific videos, and PLA cycle meetings improved maternal and child diet quality in rural Odisha, India. These components have been implemented separately in several low-income settings; effects could be increased by scaling up together.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UK AID from the UK Government, and US Agency for International Development.

Indexed as

WomenAgricultureChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansIndia

Identifiers

PMID33811818
PMCPMC8099729
OpenAlexW3144573952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.