Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811808›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of human genetics2021

30 years of repeat expansion disorders: What have we learned and what are the remaining challenges?

Christel Depienne, Jean-Louis Mandel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of human genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 269 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
269citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

269 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 438 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Systematic Review: Long-Read Sequencing in Algal Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Disruption of RNA metabolism and its impact on protein homeostasis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

209 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christel DepienneInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Sorbonne Université, UMR S 1127, Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, 75013 Paris, France. Electronic address: christel.depienne@uni-due.de.
Jean-Louis MandelInstitut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Illkirch 67400, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 7104, Illkirch 67400, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U 1258, Illkirch 67400, France; Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch 67400, France; USIAS University of Strasbourg Institute of Advanced study, 67000 Strasbourg, France. Electronic address: jlmandel@igbmc.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tandem repeats represent one of the most abundant class of variations in human genomes, which are polymorphic by nature and become highly unstable in a length-dependent manner. The expansion of repeat length across generations is a well-established process that results in human disorders mainly affecting the central nervous system. At least 50 disorders associated with expansion loci have been described to date, with half recognized only in the last ten years, as prior methodological difficulties limited their identification. These limitations still apply to the current widely used molecular diagnostic methods (exome or gene panels) and thus result in missed diagnosis detrimental to affected individuals and their families, especially for disorders that are very rare and/or clinically not recognizable. Most of these disorders have been identified through family-driven approaches and many others likely remain to be identified. The recent development of long-read technologies provides a unique opportunity to systematically investigate the contribution of tandem repeats and repeat expansions to the genetic architecture of human disorders. In this review, we summarize the current and most recent knowledge about the genetics of repeat expansion disorders and the diversity of their pathophysiological mechanisms and outline the perspectives of developing personalized treatments in the future.

Indexed as

Trinucleotide Repeat ExpansionAnticipation, GeneticBiomedical ResearchFounder EffectGenes, DominantGenes, RecessiveGenome, HumanHumansTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID33811808
PMCPMC8205997
OpenAlexW3147352572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.