Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811723›Full record

Observational studyJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2021

Exploring Large Community- and Clinically-Generated Datasets to Understand Resilience Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Karen A Monsen, Robin R Austin, Bhavana Goparaju, Robert Clarence Jones, Michelle A Mathiason, Anna Pirsch, Milton Eder

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Measuring Whole Person Health: A Scoping Review.Journal of integrative and complementary medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen A MonsenZeta, Professor, University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0196-9799
Robin R AustinAssistant Professor, University of Minnesota, School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1993-4623
Bhavana GoparajuPhD Student, University of Minnesota Academic Health Center, Institute for Health Informatics, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Robert Clarence JonesCommunity Liaison, Hue-MAN Partnership, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Michelle A MathiasonStatician, University of Minnesota, School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Anna PirschPhD Student, University of Minnesota, School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Milton EderCommunity Liaison, Hue-MAN Partnership, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore resilience in the context of whole-person health and the social determinants of health at the individual and community levels using large, standardized nursing datasets.

designA retrospective, observational, correlational study of existing deidentified Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant data using the Omaha System and its equivalent, Simplified Omaha System Terms.

methodsWe used three samples to explore for patterns of resilience: pre-COVID-19 community-generated data (N = 383), pre-COVID-19 clinical documentation data (N = 50,509), and during-COVID-19 community-generated data (N = 102). Community participants used the My Strengths + My Health (MSMH) app to generate the two community datasets. The clinical data were obtained from the Omaha System Data Collaborative. We operationalized resilience as Omaha System Status scores of 4 (minimal signs or symptoms) or 5 (no signs or symptoms) as a discrete strengths measure for each of 42 Omaha System problem concepts. We used visualization techniques and standard descriptive and inferential statistics for analysis.

findingsIt was feasible to examine resilience, operationalized as strengths by problem concept, within existing Omaha System or Simplified Omaha System Terms (MSMH) data. We identified several patterns indicating strengths and resilience that were consistent with literature related to community connectedness for community participants, and sleep for individuals in the clinical data.

conclusionsWhen used consistently, the Omaha System within MSMH enabled robust data collection for a comprehensive, holistic assessment, resulting in better whole-person data including strengths, and enabled us to discover a potentially useful approach for defining resilience in new ways using standardized nursing data. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The notion that how we assess individuals and communities (i.e., the completeness of our assessments in relation to whole-person health) determines what we can know about resilience is seemingly in opposition to the critical need to decrease documentation burden, despite the potential to shift from a problem deficit-based assessment to one of strengths and resilience. However, a patient-facing comprehensive assessment that includes resilience and the social determinants of health can provide a transformative, whole-person platform for strengths-based care and population management.

Indexed as

PandemicsResilience, PsychologicalCOVID-19Datasets as TopicHumansNursesRetrospective StudiesBig datacommunityCOVID-19Omaha systemresiliencesocial determinants of healthstrengths

Identifiers

PMID33811723
PMCPMC8251015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.