Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811623›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2021

Nursing home leaders' perceptions of a research partnership.

Rosa R Baier, Ellen McCreedy, Rebecca Uth, David R Gifford, Terrie Wetle

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosa R BaierCenter for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA. Rosa_Baier@Brown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0284-1749
Ellen McCreedyCenter for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4063-8220
Rebecca UthCenter for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
David R GiffordAmerican Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7102-3961
Terrie WetleDepartment of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-0585
Brown University · USAmerican Health Care Association · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivePartnerships between healthcare providers and researchers may accelerate the translation of interventions into widespread practice by testing them under real-world conditions, but depend on provider's willingness to engage with researchers and ability to fully implement an intervention.

aimTo understand nursing home leader's motivations for participating in a research study and perceptions of the process and value.

methodsAfter a feasibility study of tuned lighting in a nursing home, we conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with six facility leaders. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by four investigators.

resultsThree themes emerged: (1) The importance of the nursing home's culture and context: the facility had stable leadership, clear processes for prioritizing and implementing new initiatives, and an established interest in the study's topic. (2) The importance of leader's belief in the value of the intervention: leaders perceived research generally and the intervention specifically as positively impacting their facility and residents. (3) The importance of ongoing collaboration and flexibility throughout the study period: leaders served as champions to catalyze the project and overcome implementation barriers.

conclusionNursing home leader's perspectives about their participation in a feasibility study underscore the importance of establishing strong researcher-provider partnerships, understanding the environment in which the intervention will be implemented, and employing pragmatic methods that allow for flexibility in response to real-world implementation barriers. We recommend eliciting qualitative information to understand the environment in which an intervention will be implemented and to engage opinion leaders who can inform the protocol and champion its success.

Indexed as

LeadershipNursing HomesHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchEmbedded researchNursing homePragmatic researchQualitativeStakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID33811623
PMCPMC8019299
OpenAlexW3151278829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.