Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811595›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2021

Performance of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) on a quantity discrimination task is similar to that of African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana).

Rebecca J Snyder, Lisa P Barrett, Rachel A Emory, Bonnie M Perdue

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca J SnyderOklahoma City Zoo, 2000 Remington Way, Oklahoma City, OK, 73111, USA. RSnyder@okczoo.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6608-3601
Lisa P BarrettOklahoma City Zoo, 2000 Remington Way, Oklahoma City, OK, 73111, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6072-3479
Rachel A EmoryOklahoma City Zoo, 2000 Remington Way, Oklahoma City, OK, 73111, USA.
Bonnie M PerdueAgnes Scott College, 141 E. College Avenue, Decatur, GA, 30030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1815-4353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using an object-choice task, we measured the relative quantity discrimination ability of Asian elephants. Two zoo-housed elephants were given auditory cues of food being dropped into two containers (Nonvisible condition), and in one condition they could also see the food on top of the containers (Visible condition). Elephants received sets of varying ratios and magnitudes. We found that the elephants chose the greater quantity of food significantly above chance in both the Visible and Nonvisible conditions. Additionally, we found the elephants' ability to discriminate between quantities decreased as the ratio, and not the absolute difference, between the quantities increased, which is predicted by the accumulator model. We also compare our findings to those from a study using the same methods with African savanna elephants and found that the two species performed at similar levels, but given our small sample size it is difficult to make strong species-level conclusions. In discussing our results, we consider differences between the two species' wild environments as well as the types of sensory cues provided in human care, and we provide recommendations for extensions of this work.

Indexed as

ElephantsAnimalsCuesFoodGrasslandHumansAccumulator modelComparative cognitionElephant cognitionNumerical cognitionObject-file modelRelative quantity judgment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.