Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811556›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

Daily 30-min exposure to artificial gravity during 60 days of bed rest does not maintain aerobic exercise capacity but mitigates some deteriorations of muscle function: results from the AGBRESA RCT.

Andreas Kramer, María Venegas-Carro, Jochen Zange, Wolfram Sies, Nicola A Maffiuletti, Markus Gruber, Hans Degens, María Moreno-Villanueva, Edwin Mulder

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andreas KramerHuman Performance Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany. andreas.kramer@uni-konstanz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2586-5508
María Venegas-CarroHuman Performance Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.
Jochen ZangeInstitute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany.
Wolfram SiesInstitute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany.
Nicola A MaffiulettiHuman Performance Lab, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus GruberHuman Performance Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.
Hans DegensDepartment of Life Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
María Moreno-VillanuevaHuman Performance Research Centre, Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.
Edwin MulderInstitute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany.

Funding

Biomedical Research and Environmental Sciences Division 80JSC018P0078Bundesbehörden der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft 236-01Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt FKZ50WB1734European Space Agency 4000113871/15/NL/PGUnited Kingdom Space Agency ST/S0001735/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpaceflight impairs physical capacity. Here we assessed the protective effect of artificial gravity (AG) on aerobic exercise capacity and muscle function during bed rest, a spaceflight analogue.

methods24 participants (33 ± 9 years, 175 ± 9 cm, 74 ± 10 kg, 8 women) were randomly allocated to one of three groups: continuous AG (cAG), intermittent AG (iAG) or control (CTRL). All participants were subjected to 60 days of six-degree head-down tilt bed rest, and subjects of the intervention groups completed 30 min of centrifugation per day: cAG continuously and iAG for 6 × 5 min, with an acceleration of 1g at the center of mass. Physical capacity was assessed before and after bed rest via maximal voluntary contractions, cycling spiroergometry, and countermovement jumps.

resultsAG had no significant effect on aerobic exercise capacity, flexor muscle function and isometric knee extension strength or rate of force development (RFD). However, AG mitigated the effects of bed rest on jumping power (group * time interaction of the rmANOVA p < 0.001; iAG - 25%, cAG - 26%, CTRL - 33%), plantar flexion strength (group * time p = 0.003; iAG - 35%, cAG - 31%, CTRL - 48%) and plantar flexion RFD (group * time p = 0.020; iAG - 28%, cAG - 12%, CTRL - 40%). Women showed more pronounced losses than men in jumping power (p < 0.001) and knee extension strength (p = 0.010).

conclusionThe AG protocols were not suitable to maintain aerobic exercise capacity, probably due to the very low cardiorespiratory demand of this intervention. However, they mitigated some losses in muscle function, potentially due to the low-intensity muscle contractions during centrifugation used to avoid presyncope.

Indexed as

Bed RestGravity, AlteredAdultErgometryExercise ToleranceFemaleHead-Down TiltHumansMaleMuscle ContractionTime FactorsArtificial gravityAstronaut trainingCountermeasurePhysical inactivityPhysical performance

Identifiers

PMID33811556
PMCPMC8192329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.