Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811524›Full record

ReviewArchivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis2021

New Approaches to the Prevention and Treatment of Viral Diseases.

Alexander V Pronin, Alexander N Narovlyansky, Alexander V Sanin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Transcriptome Profiling ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Unlocking STING as a Therapeutic Antiviral Strategy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander V ProninN.F. Gamaleya National Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Gamaleya 18, Moscow, Russia, 123098. proninalexander@yandex.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5266-9783
Alexander N NarovlyanskyN.F. Gamaleya National Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Gamaleya 18, Moscow, Russia, 123098.
Alexander V SaninN.F. Gamaleya National Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Gamaleya 18, Moscow, Russia, 123098.
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The review discusses a new approach to the prevention and treatment of viral infections based on the use of pine needles polyprenyl phosphate (PPP) and associated with the infringement of prenylation process-the attachment of farnesol or geranyl geraniol to the viral protein. Currently, prenylation has been detected in type 1 adenovirus, hepatitis C virus, several herpes viruses, influenza virus, HIV. However, this list is far from complete, given that prenylated proteins play an extremely important role in the activity of the virus. We assume that the interferon produced in response to PPP may suppress expression of the SREBP2 transcription factor. As a result, the mevalonic acid pathway is violated and, as a result, the formation of early polyprenols precursors (geraniol, geranyl geraniol, farnesol), which are necessary for the prenylation of viral proteins, is blocked and the formation of mature, virulent virus particles is broken. As a consequence, the maturation of viral particles is inhibited, and defective particles are formed. Polyprenol was extracted from greenery (pine, fir and spruce needles, mulberry leaves, etc.), purified by chromatography, phosphorylated and identified by HPLC and NMR. Obtained PPP was used as antiviral in some experimental models in vitro and in vivo. During numerous studies, it was found that PPP manifested versatile antiviral effects, both in vitro and in vivo. The maximum effect was observed with viruses in which the presence of prenylated proteins was established, namely influenza A virus, HIV-1, tick-borne encephalitis virus, hepatitis A and C viruses, herpes simplex viruses type 1 and 2, some coronavirus. The available data obtained both in the experimental conditions and during clinical trials allow us to regard PPPs as safe and effective medicine for prevention and treatment of viral diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsClinical Trials as TopicDisease Models, AnimalGene Expression RegulationHumansInterferonsMicroscopy, ElectronPinusPolyisoprenyl PhosphatesProtein PrenylationSterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 2Treatment OutcomeViral ProteinsVirionVirus DiseasesAntiviral AgentsInterferonsPolyisoprenyl PhosphatesSterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 2Viral ProteinsCoronavirusInterferonsPlant polyprenolsPrenylationSREBP2Viral infection

Identifiers

PMID33811524
PMCPMC8019082
OpenAlexW3150160019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.