Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811498›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2021

Integrated Physiological Biomarkers Responses in Wild Fish Exposed to the Anthropogenic Gradient in the Biobío River, South-Central Chile.

Mauricio Quiroz-Jara, Silvia Casini, Maria Cristina Fossi, Rodrigo Orrego, Juan F Gavilán, Ricardo Barra

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mauricio Quiroz-JaraDepartment of Aquatic Systems, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and EULA-Chile Centre, University of Concepción, PO Box 160-C, Concepción, Chile. mauquiroz@udec.cl.ORCID 0000-0001-8732-9025
Silvia CasiniDepartment of Physical, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Università di Siena, via Pier Andrea Mattioli, 4, Siena, Italy.
Maria Cristina FossiDepartment of Physical, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Università di Siena, via Pier Andrea Mattioli, 4, Siena, Italy.
Rodrigo OrregoNatural Science Institute Alexander von Humboldt, Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, Faculty of Marine Sciences and Biological Resources, University of Antofagasta, Av. Universidad de Antofagasta, 02800, Antofagasta, Chile.
Juan F GavilánDepartment of Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Science, Universidad of Concepción, PO Box 160-C, Concepción, Chile.
Ricardo BarraDepartment of Aquatic Systems, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and EULA-Chile Centre, University of Concepción, PO Box 160-C, Concepción, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the physiological state of the wild fish inhabiting the Biobío River in South-Central Chile, susceptible to the chemical contamination from different sources, biochemical and physiological biomarkers were applied to wild fish Percilia irwini and Trichomycterus areolatus in situ. Fish caught in the Biobío river in low, medium, and high anthropic impacts areas, with different pollution degrees along the river. Ethoxyresorufin O-O deethylase (EROD) activity was evaluated in fish liver. Length, weight, Gonad weight and Liver weight, Physiological Index, and gill and liver histopathology were conducted. Physicochemical parameters (pH, Temperature, Conductivity, and TDS) were measured at each sampling site. The results indicated a deteriorating condition in the biological parameters of both species in a high anthropic zone. Fishes show an increase in physiological indices and EROD liver activity, agreeing with previous studies supporting evidence of reproductive change development as we move downstream the river. Also, an increase in histopathological lesions towards the lower third stretch of the Biobío River. The Integrated Index of Physiological Biomarkers (IPBR) indicated that sites located in the high impact area (P. irwini: BC: 4.09; RC: 3.38; PC: 3.50; SJ: 2.34 and T. areolatus BC: 6.06, PC: 5.37; SJ: 5.42) have the most detrimental environmental quality, compared to reference area. The integrated biomarker analysis demonstrates that the alterations observed are related to the high anthropic activity levels downstream from the sites with the least intervention, demonstrating that the IPBR used is a complementary tool for studies of the Environmental Effects Monitoring approach.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsBiomarkersChileFishesBiomarkersWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnthropogenic effectsBiomarkersPhysiological indexWild fish

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.