Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811488›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022

Percutaneous operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis may not increase the general rate of complications compared to non-operative treatment.

Laura Gericke, Annemarie Fritz, Georg Osterhoff, Christoph Josten, Philipp Pieroh, Andreas Höch

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07624942 (Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery in Patients With Tile B and C Pelvic Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07624942 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Robot Assisted Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery in Patients With Tile B and C Pelvic Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorJunbo LiangRan2026 to 2028Enrolled88ConditionsPelvic FractureArmsRobot Assisted Minimally Invasive Fixation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Surgical complications after fixation of minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The grade of instability in fragility fractures of the pelvis correlates with impaired early mobilization.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Observational
  16. Prospective assessment of key factors influencing treatment strategy and outcome of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP).European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  17. Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a critical analysis of 140 patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura GerickeDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Annemarie FritzDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Georg OsterhoffDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5051-0998
Christoph JostenDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8055-3462
Philipp PierohDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0906-5479
Andreas HöchDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. Andreas.Hoech@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-0614
University Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite an increasing number of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) over the last 2 decades, controversy persists on their therapy with special regard to potential complications. Therefore, the present study compared the complication rates and in-hospital mortality of non-operative therapy, percutaneous treatment and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of pelvic fractures in elderly patients.

methodsAll consecutive patients treated for FFP between January 2013 and December 2017 aged 65 years or older were retrospectively identified from an institutional database. Demographic data and specific patient data were collected with a special focus on pre-existing comorbidities. General and surgical complications, hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality rates were compared.

results379 patients (81.3 ± 7.5 years; 81% female) were identified, 211 (55.7%) were treated non-operatively, 74 (19.5%) percutaneously and 94 (24.8%) with ORIF. The rate of general complications did not differ between treatment groups (non-operative: 21.8%; percutaneous: 28.4%; ORIF: 33.0%; p = 0.103). Surgery-related complications were twofold more frequent in the ORIF group as than in the percutaneously treated group (18.1% vs. 9.5%). The LOS differed significantly (non-operatively: 8.9 ± 7.1 days; percutaneous: 16.6 ± 8.2 days; ORIF: 19.3 ± 12.8 days; p < 0.001). Hospital mortality rate was higher in patients with ORIF (5.3%) than percutaneous treatment (0%) (p = 0.044).

conclusionsComplication rates and hospital mortality in elderly patients with FFPs are high and associated with long LOS. For surgical treatment of FFPs, the complication rate and mortality can be significantly reduced using percutaneous procedures compared to ORIF. Therefore, percutaneous surgery should be preferred where possible.

Indexed as

Fractures, BonePelvic BonesAgedFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansMalePelvisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComplicationsFragility fractures of the pelvisMortalityNon-operative treatmentOperative treatment

Identifiers

PMID33811488
PMCPMC9532300
OpenAlexW3148622608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.