Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811265›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

The lack of retropatellar resurfacing at index surgery is significantly associated with failure in patients following patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty: a multi-center study of more than 260 patients.

Andreas B Imhoff, Eva Bartsch, Christoph Becher, Peter Behrens, Gerrit Bode, Matthias Cotic, Theresa Diermeier, Holger Falk, Matthias J Feucht, Ulrich Haupt and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Patellofemoral joint replacement: onlay or inlay?]Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Digital study on the relationship between position of patellar high point and shape of osteotomy surface in Chinese].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 16 institutions in 5 countries.

Andreas B ImhoffDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. imhoff@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-6446
Eva BartschDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Christoph BecherATOS Clinic Heidelberg, Bismarckstr. 9-15, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter BehrensOrthodok, Tonndorfer Hauptstraße 71, 22045, Hamburg, Germany.
Gerrit BodeDepartment of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Matthias CoticDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Theresa DiermeierDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Holger FalkGelenkzentrum Rhein-Main, Frankfurter Straße 94, 65239, Hochheim am Main, Germany.
Matthias J FeuchtDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Ulrich HauptOrthomotion, City Clinic Thun, Marktgasse 17, 3600, Thun, Switzerland.
Stefan HinterwimmerOrthoPlus Munich, Alte Börse, Lenbachplatz 2a, 80333, Munich, Germany.
Johannes HolzOrthocentrum, Hansastr. 1-3, 20149, Hamburg, Germany.
René HutterDepartment of Orthopedics, Kantonspital Graubünden, Loëstrasse 99, 7000, Chur, Switzerland.
René KaiserOrthocentrum, Hansastr. 1-3, 20149, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias KnoblauchGelenkzentrum Leipzig, Richard-Lehmann-Str. 21, 04275, Leipzig, Germany.
Wolfgang NebelungDepartment of Sport Orthopedics, St. Vinzenz Hospital, Schloßstr. 85, 40477, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Philipp NiemeyerDepartment of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Turlough O'DonnelCenter for Orthopaedics, Beacon Hospital, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Dublin, Ireland.
Geert PagenstertKnee Institute Basel, CLARAHOF Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery, MERIAN-ISELIN-Hospital, Swiss Olympic Medical Center, Föhrenstr. 2, 4054, Basel, Switzerland.
Thilo PatzerOrthopädie-Zentrum, Schön Klinik, Am Heerdter Krankenhaus 2, 40549, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tim RoseGelenkzentrum Leipzig, Richard-Lehmann-Str. 21, 04275, Leipzig, Germany.
Marco C RuppDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Thomas TischerDepartment of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Rostock, Doberanerstr. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Arne J VenjakobDepartment of Sport Orthopedics, St. Vinzenz Hospital, Schloßstr. 85, 40477, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stephan VogtDepartment of Sports Orthopedics, Hessing Stiftung, Hessingstr. 17, 86199, Augsburg, Germany.
Jonas PogorzelskiDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DERückenzentrum am Michel · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEAtos (France) · FRBeaumont Hospital · IEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf · DEGeneral Electric (Germany) · DEHess (United States) · USKantonsspital Graubünden · CHMunich School of Philosophy · DEOlympic Medical Center · USSpital STS · CHUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up following contemporary patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty (PFIA) and to identify potential risk factors for failure in a multi-center study.

methodsAll patients who underwent implantation of PFIA between 09/2009 and 11/2016 at 11 specialized orthopedic referral centers were enrolled in the study and were evaluated retrospectively at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Tegner Scale, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and subjective patient satisfaction. Pre- and perioperative risk factors were compared among failures and non-failures to determine potential risk factors.

resultsA total of 263 patients (85% follow-up rate) could be enrolled. The mean age at the time of index surgery was 49 ± 12 years with a mean postoperative follow-up of 45 ± 18 months. The overall failure rate was 11% (28 patients), of which 18% (5 patients) were patients with patella resurfacing at index surgery and 82% (23 patients) were patients without initial patella resurfacing. At final follow-up, 93% of the patients who did not fail were satisfied with the procedure with a mean transformed WOMAC Score of 84.5 ± 14.5 points, a mean KOOS Score of 73.3 ± 17.1 points, a mean Tegner Score of 3.4 ± 1.4 points and a mean VAS pain of 2.4 ± 2.0 points. An increased BMI was significantly correlated with a worse postoperative outcome. Concomitant procedures addressing patellofemoral instability or malalignment, the lack of patellofemoral resurfacing at the index surgery and a high BMI were significantly correlated with failure in our patient cohort.

conclusionPatellofemoral inlay arthroplasty shows high patient satisfaction with good functional outcomes at short-term follow-up and thus can be considered a viable treatment option in young patients suffering from isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Patellar resurfacing at index surgery is recommended to decrease the risk of failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Indexed as

OsteoarthritisOsteoarthritis, KneePatellofemoral JointArthroplastyFollow-Up StudiesHumansPainPatellaRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeInlayKneePatellofemoralPatellofemoral arthroplastyPatellofemoral osteoarthritisPatellofemoral resurfacingRetropatellar resurfacingTrochleaWAVE prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID33811265
PMCPMC9007771
OpenAlexW3145495736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.