Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811264›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2022

Midterm results of a new personalized knee implant for total knee arthroplasty: implant survivorship and patient-reported outcome after five years' follow-up.

Cristina Dauder Gallego, Irene Blanca Moreno Fenoll, José Luis Patiño Contreras, Francisco Javier Moreno Coronas, María Del Carmen Torrejón de la Cal, Javier Martínez Martín

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristina Dauder GallegoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain. cristina.dauder@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3343-8485
Irene Blanca Moreno FenollDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
José Luis Patiño ContrerasDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Javier Moreno CoronasDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
María Del Carmen Torrejón de la CalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Martínez MartínDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Persona® system is a newly launched implant designed for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with technical innovations intended for a better functional outcome and higher flexion range. The aim of this study is to evaluate midterm outcomes and survivorship of a cohort of patients with a minimum of 5-year follow-up and to confirm previous results described in the literature.

methodsA cohort of 91 knees (85 patients) that underwent a patella-preserving TKA with the Persona® implant and who were followed for a mean of 5.9 years' period was included in the study. Functional values were measured: Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Knee score (KSKS) and Knee Society Function score (KSFS). Range of movement (ROM), lower limb axis correction, mobilization and complications were also registered at the last follow-up and underwent statistical analysis.

resultsWe found a low rate of complications or radiological changes with an implant-related revision rate of 2.19%. Mean results for PROMS were 44.21 ± 4 in OKS, 90.94 ± 2.4 in KSS and 97.88 ± 9.6 in KSFS. Mean postoperative ROM was 120.8º ± 12.37º. There was no change in implant positions at the final follow-up. We found radiolucent lines in 3 knees (3.29%).

conclusionAt a mean follow-up of 5.9 years, the implant-related cumulative percentage revision rate was 3.3% (2 of 91) at a mean follow-up of 5.9 years, with good clinical and functional results.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesSurvivorshipTreatment OutcomeMidterm follow-upPersonalizedPROMsRetrospective studySurvival rateTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID33811264
OpenAlexW3143572421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.