Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811259›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Simulating lesion-dependent functional recovery mechanisms.

Noor Sajid, Emma Holmes, Thomas M Hope, Zafeirios Fountas, Cathy J Price, Karl J Friston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noor SajidWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK. noor.sajid.18@ucl.ac.uk.
Emma HolmesWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK.
Thomas M HopeWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK.
Zafeirios FountasWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK.
Cathy J PriceWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK.
Karl J FristonWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M023672/1Medical Research Council MR/S502522/1Wellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 205103/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT091681MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional recovery after brain damage varies widely and depends on many factors, including lesion site and extent. When a neuronal system is damaged, recovery may occur by engaging residual (e.g., perilesional) components. When damage is extensive, recovery depends on the availability of other intact neural structures that can reproduce the same functional output (i.e., degeneracy). A system's response to damage may occur rapidly, require learning or both. Here, we simulate functional recovery from four different types of lesions, using a generative model of word repetition that comprised a default premorbid system and a less used alternative system. The synthetic lesions (i) completely disengaged the premorbid system, leaving the alternative system intact, (ii) partially damaged both premorbid and alternative systems, and (iii) limited the experience-dependent plasticity of both. The results, across 1000 trials, demonstrate that (i) a complete disconnection of the premorbid system naturally invoked the engagement of the other, (ii) incomplete damage to both systems had a much more devastating long-term effect on model performance and (iii) the effect of reducing learning capacity within each system. These findings contribute to formal frameworks for interpreting the effect of different types of lesions.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAction PotentialsBehaviorBrainHumansModels, BiologicalNeuronal PlasticityRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID33811259
PMCPMC8018968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.