Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811234›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Partial shading by solar panels delays bloom, increases floral abundance during the late-season for pollinators in a dryland, agrivoltaic ecosystem.

Maggie Graham, Serkan Ates, Andony P Melathopoulos, Andrew R Moldenke, Sandra J DeBano, Lincoln R Best, Chad W Higgins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ecologically informed solar enables a sustainable energy transition in US croplands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maggie GrahamDepartment of Biological and Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97330, USA. grahaann@oregonstate.edu.
Serkan AtesDepartment of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97330, USA.
Andony P MelathopoulosDepartment of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97330, USA.
Andrew R MoldenkeDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97330, USA.
Sandra J DeBanoDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Hermiston Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Hermiston, OR, 97838, USA.
Lincoln R BestDepartment of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97330, USA.
Chad W HigginsDepartment of Biological and Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97330, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habitat for pollinators is declining worldwide, threatening the health of both wild and agricultural ecosystems. Photovoltaic solar energy installation is booming, frequently near agricultural lands, where the land underneath ground-mounted photovoltaic panels is traditionally unused. Some solar developers and agriculturalists in the United States are filling the solar understory with habitat for pollinating insects in efforts to maximize land-use efficiency in agricultural lands. However, the impact of the solar panel canopy on the understory pollinator-plant community is unknown. Here we investigated the effects of solar arrays on plant composition, bloom timing and foraging behavior of pollinators from June to September (after peak bloom) in full shade plots and partial shade plots under solar panels as well as in full sun plots (controls) outside of the solar panels. We found that floral abundance increased and bloom timing was delayed in the partial shade plots, which has the potential to benefit late-season foragers in water-limited ecosystems. Pollinator abundance, diversity, and richness were similar in full sun and partial shade plots, both greater than in full shade. Pollinator-flower visitation rates did not differ among treatments at this scale. This demonstrates that pollinators will use habitat under solar arrays, despite variations in community structure across shade gradients. We anticipate that these findings will inform local farmers and solar developers who manage solar understories, as well as agriculture and pollinator health advocates as they seek land for pollinator habitat restoration in target areas.

Identifiers

PMID33811234
PMCPMC8018959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.