Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811223›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments.

Laurie Geers, Mauro Pesenti, Gerard Derosiere, Julie Duque, Laurence Dricot, Michael Andres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laurie GeersPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Place Cardinal Mercier 10, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Mauro PesentiPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Place Cardinal Mercier 10, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Gerard DerosiereInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, Brussels, Belgium.
Julie DuqueInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, Brussels, Belgium.
Laurence DricotInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, Brussels, Belgium.
Michael AndresPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Place Cardinal Mercier 10, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. michael.andres@uclouvain.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prospective judgments about one's capability to perform an action are assumed to involve mental simulation of the action. Previous studies of motor imagery suggest this simulation is supported by a large fronto-parietal network including the motor system. Experiment 1 used fMRI to assess the contribution of this fronto-parietal network to judgments about one's capacity to grasp objects of different sizes between index and thumb. The neural network underlying prospective graspability judgments overlapped the fronto-parietal network involved in explicit motor imagery of grasping. However, shared areas were located in the right hemisphere, outside the motor cortex, and were also activated during perceptual length judgments, suggesting a contribution to object size estimate rather than motor simulation. Experiment 2 used TMS over the motor cortex to probe transient excitability changes undetected with fMRI. Results show that graspability judgments elicited a selective increase of excitability in the thumb and index muscles, which was maximal before the object display and intermediate during the judgment. Together, these findings suggest that prospective action judgments do not rely on the motor system to simulate the action per se but to refresh the memory of one's maximal grip aperture and facilitate its comparison with object size in right fronto-parietal areas.

Indexed as

JudgmentBrainBrain MappingEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleFrontal LobeHand StrengthHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor ActivityParietal LobeTime FactorsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33811223
PMCPMC8018944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.