Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33811049›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

A two-arm parallel-group individually randomised prison pilot study of a male remand alcohol intervention for self-efficacy enhancement: the APPRAISE study protocol.

Aisha Holloway, Victoria Guthrie, Gillian Waller, Jamie Smith, Joanne Boyd, Sharon Mercado, Pam Smith, Rosie Stenhouse, Aziz Sheikh, Richard Anthony Parker and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Aisha HollowaySchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Aisha.Holloway@ed.ac.uk.
Victoria GuthrieSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3920-2342
Gillian WallerSchool of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Jamie SmithSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Joanne BoydSchool of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Sharon MercadoSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Pam SmithSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Rosie StenhouseSchool of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1253-2544
Aziz SheikhDivision of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Richard Anthony ParkerEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew StoddartEdinburgh Health Services Research Unit, The University Of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Philip ConaglenPublic Health Directorate, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Simon CoultonCentre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Gertraud StadlerInstitute for Gender Medicine, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kate HuntInstitute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Jeremy BrayDepartment of Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensborough, UK.
Jennifer FergusonSchool of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Arun SondhiTherapeutic Solutions, London, UK.
Kieran LynchCriminal Justice, Alcohol, Drugs and Tobacco Division, Public Health England, London, UK.
Jessica ReesEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Dorothy Newbury-BirchSchool of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBTeesside University · GBCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDurham County Council · GBNHS Lothian · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro · USUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe prevalence of at-risk drinking is far higher among those in contact with the criminal justice system (73%) than the general population (35%). However, there is little evidence on the effectiveness of alcohol brief interventions (ABIs) in reducing risky drinking among those in the criminal justice system, including the prison system and, in particular, those on remand. Building on earlier work, A two-arm parallel group individually randomised Prison Pilot study of a male Remand Alcohol Intervention for Self-efficacy Enhancement (APPRAISE) is a pilot study designed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an ABI, delivered to male prisoners on remand. The findings of APPRAISE should provide the information required to design a future definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: APPRAISE will use mixed methods, with two linked phases, across two prisons in the UK, recruiting 180 adult men on remand: 90 from Scotland and 90 from England. Phase I will involve a two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomised pilot study. The pilot evaluation will provide data on the likely impact of A two-arm parallel group individually randomised Prison Pilot study of a male Remand Alcohol Intervention for Self-efficacy Enhancement (APPRAISE), which will be used to inform a future definitive multicentre RCT. Phase II will be a process evaluation assessing how the ABI has been implemented to explore the change mechanisms underpinning the ABI (figure 1) and to assess the context within which the ABI is delivered. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The APPRAISE protocol has been approved by the East of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (19/ES/0068), National Offender Management System (2019-240), Health Board Research and Development (2019/0268), Scottish Prison Service research and ethics committee, and by the University of Edinburgh's internal ethics department. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journal publications, presentations at local, national and international conferences, infographics and shared with relevant stakeholders through meetings and events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN27417180.

Indexed as

PrisonsSelf EfficacyAdultEnglandHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicScotlandhealth economicspublic healthsubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID33811049
PMCPMC8023744
OpenAlexW3151607869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.