Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33810461›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Periodontitis Prevalence, Severity, and Risk Factors: A Comparison of the AAP/CDC Case Definition and the EFP/AAP Classification.

Meliha Germen, Ulku Baser, Cagdas Caglar Lacin, Erhan Fıratlı, Halim İşsever, Funda Yalcin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meliha GermenPeriodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, 34134 Istanbul, Turkey.
Ulku BaserPeriodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, 34134 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9754-2142
Cagdas Caglar LacinPeriodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, 34134 Istanbul, Turkey.
Erhan FıratlıPeriodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, 34134 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4154-6929
Halim İşseverDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medical, University of Istanbul, 34104 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5435-706X
Funda YalcinPeriodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, 34134 Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis cross-sectional study evaluated the utility of the 2018 European Federation of Periodontology/American Academy of Periodontology (EFP/AAP) classifications of epidemiological studies in terms of periodontitis severity, prevalence and associated risk factors and the 2012 American Academy of Periodontology/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (AAP/CDC) case definitions.

methodsWe included 488 participants aged 35-74 years. Measurements were recorded at six sites per tooth by two qualified examiners. The evaluated parameters included pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Periodontitis prevalence and severity were reported using the 2018 EFP/AAP classification and the AAP/CDC case definitions. The data were stratified by recognized risk factors (age, diabetes and smoking status).

resultsThe 2018 EFP/AAP classification indicated that all patients suffered from periodontitis. When CAL served as the main criterion, the frequency of patients with severe (Stages III-IV) periodontitis was 54%. When the AAP/CDC case definitions were applied, the prevalence of periodontitis was 61.9% and that of severe periodontitis 16.8%. Age was the most significant risk factor, regardless of the chosen case definition.

conclusionIt is essential to employ a globalized standard case definition when monitoring periodontitis and associated risk factors.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusPeriodontitisAdultAgedCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsUnited Statesageclassificationdiabetesperiodontitisprevalencerisk factorssmokingsystemic disease

Identifiers

PMID33810461
PMCPMC8037399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.