Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33810414›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2021

High-Protein or Low Glycemic Index Diet-Which Energy-Restricted Diet Is Better to Start a Weight Loss Program?

Ewa Waliłko, Małgorzata Napierała, Marta Bryśkiewicz, Aneta Fronczyk, Liliana Majkowska

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ewa WaliłkoDepartment of Diabetology and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, 72-010 Szczecin-Police, Poland.
Małgorzata NapierałaDepartment of Diabetology and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, 72-010 Szczecin-Police, Poland.
Marta BryśkiewiczDepartment of Diabetology and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, 72-010 Szczecin-Police, Poland.
Aneta FronczykDepartment of Diabetology and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, 72-010 Szczecin-Police, Poland.
Liliana MajkowskaDepartment of Diabetology and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, 72-010 Szczecin-Police, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9650-3694
Pomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, no crossover studies have compared the effects of high-protein (HP) and low glycemic index (LGI) diets applied as starting energy-restricted diets.

methodsThirty-five overweight or obese volunteers with sedentary lifestyles aged 41.4 ± 11.0 years, with body mass index (BMI) of 33.6 ± 4.2 kg/m

resultsThe final weight loss was not significantly different when the HP diet was used first but was associated with a greater loss of fat mass: 4.6 kg (5.8; 3.0 kg) vs. 2.2 (4.5; 0.8);

conclusionsA short-term HP diet applied as a jump-start diet appeared to be more beneficial than an LGI diet, as indicated by the greater fat mass loss, preservation of muscle mass, and better effects on the lipid profile.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionDiet, High-ProteinDiet, ReducingGlycemic IndexAdultBody CompositionCross-Over StudiesHumansMiddle AgedOverweightWeight Losscrossover trialenergy-restricted diethigh-protein dietjump-start dietlow-glycaemic index diet

Identifiers

PMID33810414
PMCPMC8066419
OpenAlexW3145322769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.