Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33810292›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Approaches for Mitigating Microbial Biofilm-Related Drug Resistance: A Focus on Micro- and Nanotechnologies.

Harinash Rao, Sulin Choo, Sri Raja Rajeswari Mahalingam, Diajeng Sekar Adisuri, Priya Madhavan, Abdah Md Akim, Pei Pei Chong

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Antibiotic resistance dissemination in soil ecosystems: deep understanding for effective management and global health protection.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Isoferulic acid suppressesFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Molecular mechanisms, pathogenesis and therapeutic advances ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Peptides fromFuture microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Niosome-loaded Tet-Amp against S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harinash RaoSchool of Medicine, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Malaysia.
Sulin ChooSchool of Biosciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Malaysia.
Sri Raja Rajeswari MahalingamSchool of Pharmacy, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4499-2083
Diajeng Sekar AdisuriSchool of Medicine, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Malaysia.
Priya MadhavanSchool of Medicine, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6714-1279
Abdah Md AkimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor 43400, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5989-5804
Pei Pei ChongSchool of Biosciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8229-3593
Taylor's University · MYUniversiti Putra Malaysia · MY

Funding

Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education Fundamental Research Grant Scheme FRGS/1/2019/SKK11/TAYLOR/01/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms play an essential role in chronic and healthcare-associated infections and are more resistant to antimicrobials compared to their planktonic counterparts due to their (1) physiological state, (2) cell density, (3) quorum sensing abilities, (4) presence of extracellular matrix, (5) upregulation of drug efflux pumps, (6) point mutation and overexpression of resistance genes, and (7) presence of persister cells. The genes involved and their implications in antimicrobial resistance are well defined for bacterial biofilms but are understudied in fungal biofilms. Potential therapeutics for biofilm mitigation that have been reported include (1) antimicrobial photodynamic therapy, (2) antimicrobial lock therapy, (3) antimicrobial peptides, (4) electrical methods, and (5) antimicrobial coatings. These approaches exhibit promising characteristics for addressing the impending crisis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Recently, advances in the micro- and nanotechnology field have propelled the development of novel biomaterials and approaches to combat biofilms either independently, in combination or as antimicrobial delivery systems. In this review, we will summarize the general principles of clinically important microbial biofilm formation with a focus on fungal biofilms. We will delve into the details of some novel micro- and nanotechnology approaches that have been developed to combat biofilms and the possibility of utilizing them in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsBiofilmsFungiBandagesCross InfectionDrug Resistance, FungalHumansNanoparticlesAntifungal AgentsBiocompatible Materialsbiofilm-related resistancemicrotechnologynanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID33810292
PMCPMC8036581
OpenAlexW3143525979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.