ArticleCancers2021
Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Prostate Cancer Detection through Dual-Channel Tissue Feature Engineering.
Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The state of the art in artificial intelligence and digital pathology in prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Exploring Radiomics Features Based on H&E Images as Potential Biomarkers for Evaluating Muscle Atrophy: A Preliminary Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Developments in radionanotheranostic strategies for precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2024Review
- Inflammation in Prostate Cancer: Exploring the Promising Role of Phenolic Compounds as an Innovative Therapeutic Approach.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Brain imaging signatures of neuropathic facial pain derived by artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots in the application of artificial intelligence in cancer: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Deep Learning With Radiomics for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment: Challenges and Potential.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Texture, Morphology, and Statistical Analysis to Differentiate Primary Brain Tumors on Two-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques.Healthcare informatics research · 2022Article
- Cluster Analysis of Cell Nuclei in H&E-Stained Histological Sections of Prostate Cancer and Classification Based on Traditional and Modern Artificial Intelligence Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Paresthesia after Third Molar Extraction: A Preliminary Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The optimal diagnostic and treatment strategies for prostate cancer (PCa) are constantly changing. Given the importance of accurate diagnosis, texture analysis of stained prostate tissues is important for automatic PCa detection. We used artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to classify dual-channel tissue features extracted from Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) tissue images, respectively. Tissue feature engineering was performed to extract first-order statistic (FOS)-based textural features from each stained channel, and cancer classification between benign and malignant was carried out based on important features. Recursive feature elimination (RFE) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods were used to identify significant features, which provided the best five features out of the extracted six features. The AI techniques used in this study for binary classification (benign vs. malignant and low-grade vs. high-grade) were support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), bagging tree, boosting tree, and dual-channel bidirectional long short-term memory (DC-BiLSTM) network. Further, a comparative analysis was carried out between the AI algorithms. Two different datasets were used for PCa classification. Out of these, the first dataset (private) was used for training and testing the AI models and the second dataset (public) was used only for testing to evaluate model performance. The automatic AI classification system performed well and showed satisfactory results according to the hypothesis of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.