Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33810236›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Optimizing Sampling and Extraction Methods for Plant-Parasitic and Entomopathogenic Nematodes.

Mahfouz M M Abd-Elgawad

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biotypes and spatial distribution ofJournal of nematology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Phytoparasitic Nematodes ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Detection ofInsects · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mahfouz M M Abd-ElgawadNational Research Center, Plant Pathology Department, Agricultural and Biological Research Division, El-behooth St., Dokki 12622, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-4731-5988

Funding

Science and Technology Development Fund 172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-parasitic and entomopathogenic nematodes (PPNs and EPNs) are key groups in crop production systems. This study aims at optimizing nematode sampling and extraction methods to benefit integrated pest management (IPM) through (a) management of PPNs and (b) use of EPNs. The impacts of these methods on PPNs and EPNs to achieve cost-effective and efficient IPM programs are presented. The common misuses of sampling and extraction methods are discussed. Professionals engaged in IPM should consider sampling the reliability level in the light of the intended goal, location, crop value, susceptibility, nematode species, and available funds. Logical sampling methodology should be expanded to integrate various factors that can recover extra EPN isolates with differential pathogenicity. It should seek for the best EPN-host matching. Merits of repeated baiting for EPN extraction from soil and sieving for PPN recovery from suspensions are presented. Their extraction values may be modelled to quantify the efficiency of nematode separation. The use of proper indices of dispersion to enhance the biocontrol potential of EPNs or save costs in nematicidal applications is ideally compatible with IPM programs. Selecting an extraction method may sometimes require further tests to find the best extraction method of the existing fauna and/or flora. Cons and pros of modern sampling and extraction techniques are highlighted.

Indexed as

index of dispersionIPMmodellingmolecular approachessampling and extraction

Identifiers

PMID33810236
PMCPMC8066318
OpenAlexW3143973235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.