Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33810190›Full record

ArticlePediatric reports2021

The Lègami/Legàmi Service-An Experience of Psychological Intervention in Maternal and Child Care during COVID-19.

Giovanna Perricone, Ilenia Rotolo, Viviana Beninati, Nicolò Billeci, Valeria Ilarda, Concetta Polizzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanna PerriconeSocietà Italiana di Psicologia Pediatrica (S.I.P.Ped), 90144 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6372-1591
Ilenia RotoloSocietà Italiana di Psicologia Pediatrica (S.I.P.Ped), 90144 Palermo, Italy.
Viviana BeninatiSocietà Italiana di Psicologia Pediatrica (S.I.P.Ped), 90144 Palermo, Italy.
Nicolò BilleciSocietà Italiana di Psicologia Pediatrica (S.I.P.Ped), 90144 Palermo, Italy.
Valeria IlardaSocietà Italiana di Psicologia Pediatrica (S.I.P.Ped), 90144 Palermo, Italy.
Concetta PolizziSocietà Italiana di Psicologia Pediatrica (S.I.P.Ped), 90144 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7503-7882
Società Italiana di Cardiologia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides a descriptive analysis of the Lègami/Legàmi service, a free psychological support service in maternal and childcare, offered through the internet and by telephone that was initiated by the Italian Society of Pediatric Psychology (S.I.P.Ped.) during the COVID-19 medical emergency as an act of solidarity, first independently, and then in collaboration with the Italian Ministry of Health. This paper presents findings related to the "universe" of people who called the toll-free service, from the sociocultural characteristics of the users to the information collected by the professionals during the psychological pathways until human satisfaction was achieved. We provide a retrospective description of an experience that took place between April and June 2020, and which involved users of the maternal-infant area calling from the whole Italy. (1) Methods: The aims of this study were to investigate the configuration of the indicators identified and to detect the possible correlations between them in the sample. There were 193 users who took advantage of the Service, 160 of whom continued beyond the reception service; it is this group that we report the findings from here. The tool used was a form reporting access to care and interventions, and the resulting data underwent a content analysis and the indicators were subject to non-parametric statistical analysis to analyze differences and relationships. (2) Results: There were many correlations among the indicators that revealed a high prevalence of calls due to personal motivations and requests for support, which later allowed users to gain a greater understanding of the underlying problems they were facing. The professionals running the service noticed a prevalence of weaknesses attributable to the negative emotions of its users, alongside a presence of cognitive and relational resources. The professionals' interventions, which can be characterized by a prevalence of social support, psychological rehabilitation, and psychoeducation, achieved outcomes of redefining users' relationships with themselves and others. All of the service's users have expressed a high level of satisfaction with it. (3) Discussion: Our results revealed the protective and transformative effects of the service for its users and the underlying importance of having an easily accessible psychological support system in place during emergencies, like the recent pandemic. In conditions like these, the great value of a remote support service should be noted, and despite its limitations, assures its own efficacy when a medical emergency precludes closer in-person forms of psychological assistance.

Indexed as

COVID-19difficultiesneedspsychological supportresources

Identifiers

PMID33810190
PMCPMC8006011
OpenAlexW3135958839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.