Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33810146›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Use of Machine Learning to Investigate the Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT) towards Early Autism Screening.

Gennaro Tartarisco, Giovanni Cicceri, Davide Di Pietro, Elisa Leonardi, Stefania Aiello, Flavia Marino, Flavia Chiarotti, Antonella Gagliano, Giuseppe Maurizio Arduino, Fabio Apicella and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial Intelligence Methods in Early Detection of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A DSM-5 Criterion-Based Systematic Review.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Gennaro TartariscoNational Research Council of Italy (CNR)-Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), 98164 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9467-2024
Giovanni CicceriDepartment of Engineering, University of Messina, 98166 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1498-2215
Davide Di PietroDepartment of Engineering, University of Messina, 98166 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0011-103X
Elisa LeonardiNational Research Council of Italy (CNR)-Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), 98164 Messina, Italy.
Stefania AielloNational Research Council of Italy (CNR)-Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), 98164 Messina, Italy.
Flavia MarinoNational Research Council of Italy (CNR)-Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), 98164 Messina, Italy.
Flavia ChiarottiCenter for Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0084-6914
Antonella GaglianoChild and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari and "G. Brotzu" Hospital Trust, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9367-7739
Giuseppe Maurizio ArduinoCentro Autismo e Sindrome di Asperger ASLCN1, 12084 Mondovì, Italy.
Fabio ApicellaIRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Calambrone, 56128 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7390-3241
Filippo MuratoriIRCCS Stella Maris Foundation, Calambrone, 56128 Pisa, Italy.
Dario BruneoDepartment of Engineering, University of Messina, 98166 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6080-9077
Carrie AllisonAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8AH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-2090
Simon Baron CohenAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8AH, UK.
David VagniNational Research Council of Italy (CNR)-Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), 98164 Messina, Italy.
Giovanni PioggiaNational Research Council of Italy (CNR)-Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), 98164 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8089-7449
Liliana RutaNational Research Council of Italy (CNR)-Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), 98164 Messina, Italy.
Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Cambridge · GBFondazione Stella Maris · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past two decades, several screening instruments were developed to detect toddlers who may be autistic both in clinical and unselected samples. Among others, the Quantitative CHecklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT) is a quantitative and normally distributed measure of autistic traits that demonstrates good psychometric properties in different settings and cultures. Recently, machine learning (ML) has been applied to behavioral science to improve the classification performance of autism screening and diagnostic tools, but mainly in children, adolescents, and adults. In this study, we used ML to investigate the accuracy and reliability of the Q-CHAT in discriminating young autistic children from those without. Five different ML algorithms (random forest (RF), naïve Bayes (NB), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and K-nearest neighbors (KNN)) were applied to investigate the complete set of Q-CHAT items. Our results showed that ML achieved an overall accuracy of 90%, and the SVM was the most effective, being able to classify autism with 95% accuracy. Furthermore, using the SVM-recursive feature elimination (RFE) approach, we selected a subset of 14 items ensuring 91% accuracy, while 83% accuracy was obtained from the 3 best discriminating items in common to ours and the previously reported Q-CHAT-10. This evidence confirms the high performance and cross-cultural validity of the Q-CHAT, and supports the application of ML to create shorter and faster versions of the instrument, maintaining high classification accuracy, to be used as a quick, easy, and high-performance tool in primary-care settings.

Indexed as

autismearly screeningmachine learningQ-CHAT

Identifiers

PMID33810146
PMCPMC8004748
OpenAlexW3139285331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.