ArticleGenes2021
Noninvasive Prenatal Paternity Testing with a Combination of Well-Established SNP and STR Markers Using Massively Parallel Sequencing.
Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive Prenatal Paternity Testing: A Review on Genetic Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- NASTRA: accurate analysis of short tandem repeat markers by nanopore sequencing with repeat-structure-aware algorithm.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Early noninvasive prenatal paternity testing by targeted fetal DNA analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Low-Pass Genome Sequencing-Based Detection of Paternity: Validation in Clinical Cytogenetics.Genes · 2023Article
- Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a novel 133-plex forensic STR panel (52 STRs and 81 Y-STRs) using single-end 400 bp massive parallel sequencing.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal plasma has made it possible to develop noninvasive prenatal paternity testing (NIPPT). However, most studies have focused on customized single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing systems and few have used conventional short tandem repeat (STR) markers. Based on massively parallel sequencing (MPS), this study used a widely-accepted forensic multiplex assay system to evaluate the effect of noninvasive prenatal paternity testing with a combination of well-established SNP and STR markers. Using a ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit, NIPPT was performed in 17 real parentage cases with monovular unborn fetuses at 7 to 24 gestational weeks. Different analytical strategies for the identification of paternally inherited allele (PIA) were developed to deal with SNPs and STRs. Combined paternity index (CPI) for 17 real trios as well as 272 unrelated trios was calculated. With the combination of SNPs and A-STRs, 82.35% (14/17), 88.24% (15/17), 94.12% (16/17), and 94.12% (16/17) of real trios could be accurately determined when the likelihood ratio (LR) threshold for paternity inclusion was set to 10,000, 1000, 100, and 10, respectively. This reveals that simultaneous surveys of SNP and STR markers included in the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit offer a promising method for NIPPT using MPS technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.