Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33810059›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Pain, Pathophysiological Mechanisms, and New Therapeutic Options for Alternative Analgesic Agents in Sheep: A Review and Investigation.

Bogdan Feliks Kania, Danuta Wrońska, Urszula Bracha

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. An Exploration of Analgesia Options for Australian Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bogdan Feliks KaniaUniversity Center of Veterinary Medicine Jagiellonian University-Agricultural University, Hugon Kołłątaj Agricultural University in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7505-4642
Danuta WrońskaDepartment of Animal Physiology and Endocrinology, Animal Breeding and Biology Faculty, Hugon Kołłątaj Agricultural University in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.
Urszula BrachaCenter of Experimental and Innovative Medicine, Hugon Kołłątaj Agricultural University in Krakow, ul. Rędzina 1C, 30-248 Krakow, Poland.
University of Agriculture in Krakow · PLJagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relief from suffering is the guiding principle of medical and veterinary ethics. Medical care for animals should be carried out to meet all welfare conditions. The need for pain management is demonstrated by recent monographs devoting attention to this urgent ethical need. Little data, however, are available on the prevention and attenuation of pain in sheep. After administration of narcotic analgesics used for severe visceral pain, sheep react with a state of excitement. Therefore, it was decided to experimentally investigate the usefulness of potential non-narcotic drugs to relieve pain in sheep with intestinal colic caused by 10 min of mechanical distension of their duodenal and/or descending colonic wall. The results indicate the potential usefulness of VGCCIs (diltiazem, nifedipine, verapamil), cholecystokinin receptor antagonists (PD, proglumide), and metabotropic glutaminergic receptor antagonists (mGluRAs), such as L-AP

Indexed as

nonspecific therapypainpathomechanismssheep

Identifiers

PMID33810059
PMCPMC8004948
OpenAlexW3138565450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.