ArticlePolymers2021
Motility Improvement of Biomimetic Trachea Scaffold via Hybrid 3D-Bioprinting Technology.
Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioprinting in Tissue Repair and Its ENT Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
- Head and Neck 3D Bioprinting-A Review on Recent Advancements in Soft Tissue 3D Bioprinting and Medical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Advances in studies on tracheal stent design addressing the related complications.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Instant trachea reconstruction using 3D-bioprintedBioactive materials · 2024Article
- Current Status and Future Outlook of Additive Manufacturing Technologies for the Reconstruction of the Trachea.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in Decellularized Matrix-Derived Materials for Bioink and 3D Bioprinting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A Review of Woven Tracheal Stents: Materials, Structures, and Application.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Recent Progress and Potential Biomedical Applications of Electrospun Nanofibers in Regeneration of Tissues and Organs.Polymers · 2022Review
- Hydrogel modification of 3D printing hybrid tracheal scaffold to construct an orthotopic transplantation.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Auxetic Structures for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds and Biomedical Devices.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Palpation of the Respiratory System in Osteopathic Manual Medicine: From the Trachea to the Lungs.Cureus · 2021Review
- Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing Strategies for Irregularly Shaped Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Current State and Challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Evaluation Strategies for Tissue-engineered Tracheas: FromIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A trachea has a structure capable of responding to various movements such as rotation of the neck and relaxation/contraction of the conduit due to the mucous membrane and cartilage tissue. However, current reported tubular implanting structures are difficult to impelement as replacements for original trachea movements. Therefore, in this study, we developed a new trachea implant with similar anatomical structure and mechanical properties to native tissue using 3D printing technology and evaluated its performance. A 250 µm-thick layer composed of polycaprolactone (PCL) nanofibers was fabricated on a rotating beam using electrospinning technology, and a scaffold with C-shaped cartilage grooves that mimics the human airway structure was printed to enable reconstruction of cartilage outside the airway. A cartilage type scaffold had a highest rotational angle (254°) among them and it showed up to 2.8 times compared to human average neck rotation angle. The cartilage type showed a maximum elongation of 8 times higher than that of the bellows type and it showed the elongation of 3 times higher than that of cylinder type. In cartilage type scaffold, gelatin hydrogel printed on the outside of the scaffold was remain 22.2% under the condition where no hydrogel was left in other type scaffolds. In addition, after 2 days of breathing test, the amount of gelatin remaining inside the scaffold was more than twice that of other scaffolds. This novel trachea scaffold with hydrogel inside and outside of the structure was well-preserved under external flow and is expected to be advantageous for soft tissue reconstruction of the trachea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.