Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33809967›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

The Utility of Combined Target and Systematic Prostate Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Based on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Daiki Kato, Kaori Ozawa, Shinichi Takeuchi, Makoto Kawase, Kota Kawase, Chie Nakai, Manabu Takai, Koji Iinuma, Keita Nakane, Hiroki Kato and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daiki KatoDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4932-0497
Kaori OzawaDepartment of Urology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki 5038502, Japan.
Shinichi TakeuchiDepartment of Urology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki 5038502, Japan.
Makoto KawaseDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Kota KawaseDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Chie NakaiDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Manabu TakaiDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Koji IinumaDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Keita NakaneDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Hiroki KatoDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5926-1895
Masayuki MatsuoDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.
Natsuko SuzuiDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3593-8432
Tatsuhiko MiyazakiDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4750-2046
Takuya KoieDepartment of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2980-127X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the predictive value of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) with combined target biopsy (TBx) and systematic biopsy (SBx) in patients with suspicion of having clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). In this retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical and pathological records of 184 consecutive patients who underwent bpMRI before prostate biopsy. We focused on patients with PI-RADS v2 scores ≥ 3. MRI was performed using a 3-Tesla clinical scanner with a 32-channel phased-array receiver coil. PI-RADS v2 was used to describe bpMRI findings based on T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging scores. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy rate of PI-RADS v2 based on bpMRI for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent combined TBx and SBx. A total of 104 patients were enrolled in this study. Combined TBx and SBx was significantly superior to either method alone for PCa detection in patients with suspicious lesions according to PI-RADS v2. TBx and SBx detected concordant csPCa in only 24.1% of the patients. In addition, the rate of increase in the Gleason score was similar between SBx (41.5%) and TBx (34.1%). The diagnostic accuracy of bpMRI is comparable to that of standard multiparametric MRI for the detection of csPCa. Moreover, combined TBx and SBx may be optimal for the accurate determination of csPCa diagnosis, the International Society of Urological Pathology grade, and risk classification.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleRetrospective Studiespositive predictive valueprostate biopsyprostate cancerprostate imaging reporting and data system

Identifiers

PMID33809967
PMCPMC8025823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.