Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33809867›Full record

ArticleMarine drugs2021

A Study of Combining Elastin in the Chitosan Electrospinning to Increase the Mechanical Strength and Bioactivity.

Hengjie Su, Tomoko Fujiwara, Joel D Bumgardner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Marine drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Influence of photosensitizer concentration and polymer composition on photoinduced antimicrobial activity of PVA- and PVA-chitosan-based electrospun nanomaterials cross-linked with tailor-made silicon(IV) phthalocyanine.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hengjie SuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, UT-UofM Joint Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Engineering Technology Bldg #330, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.
Tomoko FujiwaraDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Memphis, Smith Hall #409, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3329-0361
Joel D BumgardnerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, UT-UofM Joint Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Engineering Technology Bldg #330, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7467-3078
University of Memphis · US

Funding

the Biomaterials Applications of Memphis (BAM) Laboratories in the Biomedical Engineering Department at the University of Memphis 0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While electrospun chitosan membranes modified to retain nanofibrous morphology have shown promise for use in guided bone regeneration applications in in vitro and in vivo studies, their mechanical tear strengths are lower than commercial collagen membranes. Elastin, a natural component of the extracellular matrix, is a protein with extensive elastic property. This work examined the incorporation of elastin into electrospun chitosan membranes to improve their mechanical tear strengths and to further mimic the native extracellular composition for guided bone regeneration (GBR) applications. In this work, hydrolyzed elastin (ES12, Elastin Products Company, USA) was added to a chitosan spinning solution from 0 to 4 wt% of chitosan. The chitosan-elastin (CE) membranes were examined for fiber morphology using SEM, hydrophobicity using water contact angle measurements, the mechanical tear strength under simulated surgical tacking, and compositions using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and post-spinning protein extraction. In vitro experiments were conducted to evaluate the degradation in a lysozyme solution based on the mass loss and growth of fibroblastic cells. Chitosan membranes with elastin showed significantly thicker fiber diameters, lower water contact angles, up to 33% faster degradation rates, and up to seven times higher mechanical strengths than the chitosan membrane. The FTIR spectra showed stronger amide peaks at 1535 cm

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsMembranes, ArtificialAnimalsCell ProliferationChitosanElasticityElastinFibroblastsMiceMolecular StructureNIH 3T3 CellsStructure-Activity RelationshipSurface PropertiesTensile StrengthBiocompatible MaterialsChitosanElastinMembranes, Artificialchitosanelastinelectrospinningmechanical strength

Identifiers

PMID33809867
PMCPMC8004263
OpenAlexW3136857154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.