Article in Toxins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Muhammad Zeeshan ShabbirInstitute of Plant Protection, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Ling HeInstitute of Plant Protection, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Changlong ShuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Fei YinInstitute of Plant Protection, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Jie ZhangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
Zhen-Yu LiInstitute of Plant Protection, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Institute of Plant Protection · CN
Funding
National Key Project of Research and Development Plan (2017YFD0201204 and 2018YFD0201200), Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2019B020217003-05), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 31701819) and President F National Key Project of Research and Development Plan (2017YFD0201204 and 2018YFD0201200), Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2019B020217003-05), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 31701819) and President F
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Concerns about resistance development to conventional insecticides in diamondback moth (DBM)
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Assessing the Single and Combined Toxicity of Chlorantraniliprole and · full record | OpenQuestion