ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Neuroimaging at Term Equivalent Age: Is There Value for the Preterm Infant? A Narrative Summary.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- An end to genetic exceptionalism: reframing the ethics of genomic sequencing for rapid neonatal diagnosis.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
- Neurological Outcomes in Late Preterm Infants: An Updated Review of Recent Research and Clinical Insights.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Brain MRI before and at term equivalent age predicts motor and cognitive outcomes in very preterm infants.Neuroimage. Reports · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of an MRI-Based Brain Volumetry Model Predicting Poor Psychomotor Outcomes in Preterm Neonates.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Global trends in neonatal MRI brain neuroimaging research over the last decade: a bibliometric analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Multilabel SegSRGAN-A framework for parcellation and morphometry of preterm brain in MRI.PloS one · 2024Article
- Optimizing Care for the Preterm Infant.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in neuroimaging of the preterm infant have enhanced the ability to detect brain injury. This added information has been a blessing and a curse. Neuroimaging, particularly with magnetic resonance imaging, has provided greater insight into the patterns of injury and specific vulnerabilities. It has also provided a better understanding of the microscopic and functional impacts of subtle and significant injuries. While the ability to detect injury is important and irresistible, the evidence for how these injuries link to specific long-term outcomes is less clear. In addition, the impact on parents can be profound. This narrative summary will review the history and current state of brain imaging, focusing on magnetic resonance imaging in the preterm population and the current state of the evidence for how these patterns relate to long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.