Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33809740›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Distance Motor Learning during the COVID-19 Induced Confinement: Video Feedback with a Pedagogical Activity Improves the Snatch Technique in Young Athletes.

Mohamed Abdelkader Souissi, Achraf Ammar, Omar Trabelsi, Jordan M Glenn, Omar Boukhris, Khaled Trabelsi, Bassem Bouaziz, Piotr Zmijewski, Hichem Souissi, Anis Ben Chikha and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mohamed Abdelkader SouissiResearch Unit, "Physical Activity, Sport and Health", UR18JS01, National Observatory of Sport, Tunis 1003, Tunisia.
Achraf AmmarInstitute of Sport Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0347-8053
Omar TrabelsiHigh Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Sfax University, Sfax 3000, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0001-6545-4706
Jordan M GlennDepartment of Health, Exercise Science Research Center Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Omar BoukhrisResearch Unit, "Physical Activity, Sport and Health", UR18JS01, National Observatory of Sport, Tunis 1003, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0002-2861-0164
Khaled TrabelsiHigh Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Sfax University, Sfax 3000, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-9557
Bassem BouazizMultimedia Information Systems and Advanced Computing Laboratory (MIRACL), University of Sfax, Sfax 3021, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0002-3692-9482
Piotr ZmijewskiJozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, 00-809 Warsaw, Poland.
Hichem SouissiResearch Unit, "Physical Activity, Sport and Health", UR18JS01, National Observatory of Sport, Tunis 1003, Tunisia.
Anis Ben ChikhaResearch Unit, "Physical Activity, Sport and Health", UR18JS01, National Observatory of Sport, Tunis 1003, Tunisia.
Tarak DrissInterdisciplinary Laboratory in Neurosciences, Physiology and Psychology: Physical Activity, Health andLearning (LINP2), UFR STAPS, UPL, Paris Nanterre University, 92000 Nanterre, France.
Hamdi ChtourouResearch Unit, "Physical Activity, Sport and Health", UR18JS01, National Observatory of Sport, Tunis 1003, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0002-5482-9151
Anita HoekelmannInstitute of Sport Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Nizar SouissiResearch Unit, "Physical Activity, Sport and Health", UR18JS01, National Observatory of Sport, Tunis 1003, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate which of two strategies, Video Feedback with Pedagogical Activity (VF-PA) or Video Feedback (VF), would be more beneficial for the remote error correction of the snatch weightlifting technique during the confinement period. Thirty-five school aged children with at least three months of weightlifting experience were randomized to one of three training conditions: VF-PA, VF or the Control group (CONT). Subjects underwent test sessions one week before (T0) and one day after (T1) a six-session training period and a retention test session a week later (T2). During each test session, the Kinovea version 0.8.15 software measured the kinematic parameters of the snatch performance. Following distance learning sessions (T1), the VF-PA improved various kinematic parameters (i.e., barbell horizontal displacements, maximum height, looping and symmetry) compared with T0 (

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceAthletesChildFeedbackHumansSARS-CoV-2biomechanicserror detectionexecution timefeedbackhome confinementkinematicmotor learningpandemicsweightlifting

Identifiers

PMID33809740
PMCPMC8002335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.