Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33809629›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Occupational Exposure to Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Nanofibres: More Than a Cobweb.

Enrico Bergamaschi, Giacomo Garzaro, Georgia Wilson Jones, Martina Buglisi, Michele Caniglia, Alessandro Godono, Davide Bosio, Ivana Fenoglio, Irina Guseva Canu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Immunotoxicity of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials, Starring Phagocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. RSC advances · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Enrico BergamaschiUnit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Zuretti 29, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Giacomo GarzaroUnit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Zuretti 29, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Georgia Wilson JonesUnit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Zuretti 29, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Martina BuglisiUnit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Zuretti 29, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Michele CanigliaUnit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Zuretti 29, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Alessandro GodonoUnit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Zuretti 29, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8095-5461
Davide BosioUnit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Zuretti 29, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Ivana FenoglioDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turin, Via P. Giuria 7, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6946-3105
Irina Guseva CanuCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Route de la Corniche 2, 1066 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-8421
University of Turin · ITCentre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbon nanofibers (CNFs) are erroneously considered as singular material entities. Instead, they should be regarded as a heterogeneous class of materials bearing different properties eliciting particular biological outcomes both in vitro and in vivo. Given the pace at which the industrial production of CNTs/CNFs is increasing, it is becoming of utmost importance to acquire comprehensive knowledge regarding their biological activity and their hazardous effects in humans. Animal studies carried out by inhalation showed that some CNTs/CNFs species can cause deleterious effects such as inflammation and lung tissue remodeling. Their physico-chemical properties, biological behavior and biopersistence make them similar to asbestos fibers. Human studies suggest some mild effects in workers handling CNTs/CNFs. However, owing to their cross-sectional design, researchers have been as yet unable to firmly demonstrate a causal relationship between such an exposure and the observed effects. Estimation of acceptable exposure levels should warrant a proper risk management. The aim of this review is to challenge the conception of CNTs/CNFs as a single, unified material entity and prompt the establishment of standardized hazard and exposure assessment methodologies able to properly feed risk assessment and management frameworks.

Indexed as

carbon nanofiberscarbon nanotubesepidemiological studieshealth effectsoccupational exposureoccupational exposure limitsrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID33809629
PMCPMC8002294
OpenAlexW3136334336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.