Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33809445›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Methodological Designs Applied in the Development of Computer-Based Training Programs for the Cognitive Rehabilitation in People with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Mild Dementia. Systematic Review.

Angie A Diaz Baquero, Rose-Marie Dröes, María V Perea Bartolomé, Eider Irazoki, José Miguel Toribio-Guzmán, Manuel A Franco-Martín, Henriëtte van der Roest

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Angie A Diaz BaqueroInstitute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, 37001 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0815-4480
Rose-Marie DröesDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Oldenaller 1, 1081HJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4812-1229
María V Perea BartoloméBasic Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology Department, Salamanca University, 37001 Salamanca, Spain.
Eider IrazokiDepartment of Research and Development, INTRAS Foundation, 49001 Zamora, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7716-3989
José Miguel Toribio-GuzmánDepartment of Research and Development, INTRAS Foundation, 49001 Zamora, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5678-3150
Manuel A Franco-MartínInstitute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, 37001 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3639-2523
Henriëtte van der RoestDepartment on Aging, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (TrimbosI Institute), 1013 GM Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Universidad de Salamanca · ESAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLFundación INTRAS · ESTrimbos Institute · NL

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 676265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, different computer-based cognitive training (CT) programs for people with dementia (PwD) have been developed following a psychosocial approach.

aimThis systematic review aims to identify the methodological designs applied in the development of computer-based training (CCT) programs for the rehabilitation of cognitive functioning in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia.

methodsA systematic review was conducted using the databases PubMed and PsycINFO. The search period was between 2000-2019. The study selection and data extraction processes were carried out by two independent reviewers. The protocol was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD42020159027.

resultsThirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently used methodological design in the development of CCT programs for people with MCI or mild dementia was the user-centered design (UCD). This design involves an interactive system characterized by the inclusion of end users from the initial stages of its development, throughout the establishment of functional requirements, and in the evaluation of the program's usability and user-experience (UX).

conclusionUCD was the most used methodological design for the development of CCT programs although there was quite some variation in how this design was applied. Recommendations for future studies about the development of CCT programs for people with MCI and mild dementia are given. Central focus should be the inclusion and active participation of end users from the initial stages of development.

Indexed as

cognitive trainingcomputer-based programdementiadevelopment design

Identifiers

PMID33809445
PMCPMC8002139
OpenAlexW3138958471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.