Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33809441›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) Compared to Microfractures for Chondral Defects of the Talar Shoulder: A Five-Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study.

Filippo Migliorini, Jörg Eschweiler, Nicola Maffulli, Hanno Schenker, Arne Driessen, Björn Rath, Markus Tingart

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07161128 (Pedobarographic Evaluation of Gait Biomechanics in Patients Treated With Arthroscopic Microfracture and Biologic Cartilage Scaffold for Osteochondral Defect), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07161128 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Pedobarographic Evaluation of Gait Biomechanics in Patients Treated With Arthroscopic Microfracture and Biologic Cartilage Scaffold for Osteochondral Defect (OCD) of Talus

TypeinterventionalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsOsteochondral Defects of Talus, Gait Analysis, Microfracture Procedure, Biological ScaffoldArmsarthroscopic microfracture and biological scaffold implementation for osteochondral defects of talus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee is effective in skeletally immature patients: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Cell therapies for chondral defects of the talus: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Advancements in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. [Progress in surgical treatment of osteochondral lesion of talus].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Filippo MiglioriniDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, 52064 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7220-1221
Jörg EschweilerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, 52064 Aachen, Germany.
Nicola MaffulliSchool of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University School of Medicine, Staffordshire ST4 7QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5327-3702
Hanno SchenkerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, 52064 Aachen, Germany.
Arne DriessenDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, 52064 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3966-4237
Björn RathDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, 52064 Aachen, Germany.
Markus TingartDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Clinic Aachen, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, 52064 Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EC1905A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany procedures are available to manage cartilage defects of the talus, including microfracturing (MFx) and Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC). Whether AMIC or MFx are equivalent for borderline sized defects of the talar shoulder is unclear. Thus, the present study compared the efficacy of primary isolated AMIC versus MFx for borderline sized focal unipolar chondral defects of the talar shoulder at midterm follow-up.

methodsPatients undergoing primary isolated AMIC or MFx for focal unipolar borderline sized chondral defects of the talar shoulder were recruited prospectively. For those patients who underwent AMIC, a type I/III collagen resorbable membrane was used. The outcomes of interest were: Visual Analogic Scale (VAS), Tegner Activity Scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS). The Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) was assessed by a blinded radiologist, who had not been involved in the clinical management of the patients. Data concerning complication rate and additional procedures were also collected.

resultsThe mean follow-up was 43.5 months. The mean age of the 70 patients at operation was 32.0 years, with a mean defect size of 2.7 cm

conclusionAt midterm follow-up, AMIC provides better results compared to MFx.

Indexed as

AMICankleautologous matrix induced chondrogenesischondral defectmanagementmicrofracturessurgerytalus

Identifiers

PMID33809441
PMCPMC8001819
OpenAlexW3139270828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.