Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33809432›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Horse Clinical Cytogenetics: Recurrent Themes and Novel Findings.

Monika Bugno-Poniewierska, Terje Raudsepp

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Testicular Disorders in Equids: A Case Series.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Cytogenetics in Domestic Bovids: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika Bugno-PoniewierskaDepartment of Animal Reproduction, Anatomy and Genomics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-120 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7537-6641
Terje RaudseppDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4458, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2276-475X
Texas A&M University · USUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow · PL

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju NCBiR:BIOSTRATEG2/297267/14/NCBR/2016Texas A&M Molecular Cytogenetics service Morris Animal Foundation grant D19EQ-051University of Agriculture in Krakow SUB/020013-D015USDA AFRI grant 2018-06521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical cytogenetic studies in horses have been ongoing for over half a century and clearly demonstrate that chromosomal disorders are among the most common non-infectious causes of decreased fertility, infertility, and congenital defects. Large-scale cytogenetic surveys show that almost 30% of horses with reproductive or developmental problems have chromosome aberrations, whereas abnormal karyotypes are found in only 2-5% of the general population. Among the many chromosome abnormalities reported in the horse, most are unique or rare. However, all surveys agree that there are two recurrent conditions: X-monosomy and

Indexed as

aneuploidyCGHchimerismchromosome aberrationFISHhorsemolecular cytogeneticssex reversalstructural rearrangementstranslocation

Identifiers

PMID33809432
PMCPMC8001954
OpenAlexW3138166439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.