Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33809317›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Effect of a Brain-Computer Interface Based on Pedaling Motor Imagery on Cortical Excitability and Connectivity.

Vivianne Flávia Cardoso, Denis Delisle-Rodriguez, Maria Alejandra Romero-Laiseca, Flávia A Loterio, Dharmendra Gurve, Alan Floriano, Carlos Valadão, Leticia Silva, Sridhar Krishnan, Anselmo Frizera-Neto and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sensors Technology for Medical Robotics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vivianne Flávia CardosoPostgraduate Program in Biotechnology, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), 29075-910 Vitoria, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1654-3320
Denis Delisle-RodriguezPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), 29075-910 Vitoria, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8937-031X
Maria Alejandra Romero-LaisecaPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), 29075-910 Vitoria, Brazil.
Flávia A LoterioPostgraduate Program in Biotechnology, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), 29075-910 Vitoria, Brazil.
Dharmendra GurveDepartment of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
Alan FlorianoFederal Institute of Espırito Santo (IFES), 29932-540 São Mateus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7493-6192
Carlos ValadãoPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), 29075-910 Vitoria, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0765-7094
Leticia SilvaPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), 29075-910 Vitoria, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1534-0708
Sridhar KrishnanDepartment of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4659-564X
Anselmo Frizera-NetoPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), 29075-910 Vitoria, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0687-3967
Teodiano Freire Bastos-FilhoPostgraduate Program in Biotechnology, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), 29075-910 Vitoria, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-2773

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88881.159029/201701Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo 33361.503.19197.11092017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, studies on cycling-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been standing out due to their potential for lower-limb recovery. In this scenario, the behaviors of the sensory motor rhythms and the brain connectivity present themselves as sources of information that can contribute to interpreting the cortical effect of these technologies. This study aims to analyze how sensory motor rhythms and cortical connectivity behave when volunteers command reactive motor imagery (MI) BCI that provides passive pedaling feedback. We studied 8 healthy subjects who performed pedaling MI to command an electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCI with a motorized pedal to receive passive movements as feedback. The EEG data were analyzed under the following four conditions: resting, MI calibration, MI online, and receiving passive pedaling (on-line phase). Most subjects produced, over the foot area, significant event-related desynchronization (ERD) patterns around Cz when performing MI and receiving passive pedaling. The sharpest decrease was found for the low beta band. The connectivity results revealed an exchange of information between the supplementary motor area (SMA) and parietal regions during MI and passive pedaling. Our findings point to the primary motor cortex activation for most participants and the connectivity between SMA and parietal regions during pedaling MI and passive pedaling.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesCortical ExcitabilityMotor CortexElectroencephalographyHumansImaginationbrain–computer interfacebrain connectivitylower limb rehabilitationmotor sensory rhythmspedaling

Identifiers

PMID33809317
PMCPMC8000427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.