Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33809194›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

An Evaluation of Medication Prescribing Patterns for Acute Migraine in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.

Jun Hua Lim, Leila Karimi, Tissa Wijeratne

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Intergroup time bias and aversive racism in the medical context.Journal of personality and social psychology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jun Hua LimDepartment of Neurology, AIMSS, Sunshine Hospital, Western Health, Melbourne, St Albans, VIC 3021, Australia.
Leila KarimiSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
Tissa WijeratneDepartment of Neurology, AIMSS, Sunshine Hospital, Western Health, Melbourne, St Albans, VIC 3021, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1701-7111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide and patients with acute migraine frequently present to emergency departments (ED). The current literature suggests that ED treatment of migraine headache varies across institutions. Considering this, we conducted a scoping review to summarize trends in medication prescribing patterns for acute migraine treatment in the ED setting. Trends were evaluated for factors influencing treatment choices, with particular attention placed on opioids and migraine specific therapy. This scoping review was based on the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework and included studies published between 1 January 2000 and 31 May 2020. 14 publications met the inclusion criteria. The most common classes of medication prescribed were anti-emetics or Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), but rates varied between studies. There was a concerning trend towards an underutilization of triptans and overutilization of opiates. The use of specific clinical treatment goals (e.g., two-hour pain free freedom response) was also not evident. Additionally, 88% (

Indexed as

acute careanalgesicemergency departmentmigraineNSAIDopioidtriptan

Identifiers

PMID33809194
PMCPMC7998873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.