ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Suitability of High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Routine Analysis of Small Molecules in Food, Feed and Water for Safety and Authenticity Purposes: A Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiclass Cyanotoxins in Aquatic Environments: Occurrence, Impacts and Detection Techniques.Toxins · 2026Review
- A systematic stepwise optimization framework for rapid multi-analyte UPLC-MS/MS plasma analysis with integrated sustainability assessment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microchemical Techniques for Multiclass Fungicide Residue Analysis in Complex Food Matrices.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Global Regulatory Mandates as Drivers for Advanced Chemical Analysis in Food Safety.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Electron Beam Irradiation for Efficient Antibiotic Degradation in Aqueous Solutions.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dairy goat sulfadoxine depletion trial in milk and diagnostic accuracy of the Charm Rapid One Step Assay (ROSA) SULF test.JDS communications · 2024Article
- Simultaneous Analysis of 504 Pesticide Multiresidues in Crops Using UHPLC-QTOF at MSFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Analysis of chemical contaminants in fish using high resolution mass spectrometry - A review.Trends in environmental analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Approaches to determine pesticides in marine bivalves.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Review
- A Metasurface Plasmonic Analysis Platform Combined with Gold Nanoparticles for Ultrasensitive Quantitative Detection of Small Molecules.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Novel Analytical Methods in Food Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- A Review of Pharmaceutical Robot based on Hyperspectral Technology.Journal of intelligent & robotic systems · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the last decade, food, feed and environmental analysis using high-resolution mass spectrometry became increasingly popular. Recent accessibility and technological improvements of this system make it a potential tool for routine laboratory work. However, this kind of instrument is still often considered a research tool. The wide range of potential contaminants and residues that must be monitored, including pesticides, veterinary drugs and natural toxins, is steadily increasing. Thanks to full-scan analysis and the theoretically unlimited number of compounds that can be screened in a single analysis, high-resolution mass spectrometry is particularly well-suited for food, feed and water analysis. This review aims, through a series of relevant selected studies and developed methods dedicated to the different classes of contaminants and residues, to demonstrate that high-resolution mass spectrometry can reach detection levels in compliance with current legislation and is a versatile and appropriate tool for routine testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.